Christie Would Consider Helping Fund Subway Link

TRENTON, N.J. (AP / CBS 2 / WCBS 880) — Gov. Chris Christie, who halted construction last month on a new commuter rail tunnel between New Jersey and New York City, said Monday that he would consider contributing to a cheaper alternative: extending New York’s No. 7 subway line under the Hudson River to New Jersey.

Speaking on Millennium Radio’s “Ask the Governor” program Monday night, Christie said extending the No. 7 line from Manhattan through Hoboken and onto Secaucus is ‘a much better idea” than the tunnel that was the nation’s most expensive public works project.

WCBS 880’s Levon Putney with reaction from Gov. Chris Christie

WCBS 880’s Levon Putney on the need for greater capacity under the Hudson

Christie scrapped that project because of potential cost overruns, forfeiting $3 billion in federal funds that had been approved. New Jersey could be on the hook to repay the federal government $350 million already spent.

Christie said he hadn’t yet spoken with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg about the proposal. Policymakers in Bloomberg’s office have been discussing whether it would be possible to extend the line.

“This is an example of what can happen when you decide to take a strong, principled stand on something,” Christie said. “If something is necessary, people find other ideas that are more equitable.”

Christie said the proposed subway extension has three points in its favor: It would be cheaper than the scrapped tunnel, it would connect to Penn Station and Grand Central Station and would have funding from New York City and state.

He then chided Sen. Frank Lautenberg for not speaking up on behalf of the new idea. Lautenberg helped secure federal funding for the rail tunnel.

The $8.7 billion project to construct a second rail tunnel between New Jersey and New York was 15 years in the making when Christie killed it Oct. 27. Former Gov. Jon Corzine broke ground on the project amid his re-election campaign against Christie. Christie later accused the former governor of rushing the start of the project for political gain; Corzine said he was creating jobs.

New Jersey was expected to shoulder $2.7 billion of the costs, plus overruns. The federal government and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey had each committed $3 billion to the project.

Before the most recent idea goes anywhere, it would need support from Christie, Bloomberg, who’s an independent, and New York Gov.-elect Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat. U.S. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., offered his support in obtaining federal funds to make the idea work.

(Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

More from Levon Putney
  • aikoaiko3

    michael, you are incorrect. A NJ resident earning a salary in NY will pay income taxes to NY. I am the exact opposite… I live in NY and work in NJ, with NJ getting 98% of my state income tax… and that’s only because NY has a slighter higher marginal rate.

    I don’t blame Christie for bowing out of the original project, because NJ has very little to gain. However, could someone explain why a new tunnel for a subway would cost significantly less that a new tunnel for commuter rail? I don’t understand why this is even being considered as a “cheaper alternative.”

  • Tony

    Christie is a big fat culo

  • Rugbyball

    NJ already has a subway to NYC, its the PATH. Its cheaper than the NYC Subway.
    I can already see it now, NJ Gov, Christie or who ever, gets NYC/S to pay for it and then down road when up and running, demand a cut of the money from fares and an equal control of the entire line via Port Authority! What a win/win for NJ and a lose/lose for NYC/S. 7 Train takes long enough now, don’t need to add to it by extending it to NJ. I as a NYC resident don’t want my NYC/S tax dollars going towards this! Let the Feds and NJ pay for it all.

  • michael

    Christie and NJ should fund the entire project, beyond any fed funds. NY does not benefit from the extension, whereas NJ would be gaining considerable income tax from each person going to NY to work. If Christie doesnt fund and NY ends up paying, then the MTA should charge and additional 5-10 bucks to make it similiar to NJT fares, and not just the 2.25.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Giving Tuesday
Charles Osgood Event

Listen Live