Judge Rules City Can Release Teacher Ratings

NEW YORK (AP) — A judge ruled Monday that New York City can release performance ratings for 12,000 teachers based on a statistical analysis of student test scores.

Justice Cynthia Kern of Manhattan state Supreme Court denied a petition by the United Federation of Teachers to keep the teachers’ names private, saying that releasing the ratings with their names attached would not be arbitrary or capricious under the law.

Union President Michael Mulgrew said it would appeal and would ask the Appellate Division to halt any release of the teacher ratings pending its review of the decision.

Jesse Levine, a lawyer for the city, said officials would await the appeals court’s ruling.

The union’s lawyer, Charles Moerdler, had argued at a Dec. 8 hearing that releasing the data would be an invasion of privacy and would unfairly subject teachers to public ridicule.

But Kern said in her ruling that the courts “have repeatedly held that release of job-performance-related information, even negative information such as that involving misconduct, does not constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.”

Kern said the public “has an interest in the job performance of public employees, particularly in the field of education.”

At issue are so-called value-added scores for teachers in the third through eighth grades whose students take New York state math and English tests.

The ratings are intended to measure whether a particular teacher’s students scored better or worse than expected on the tests. The city Department of Education uses the data to evaluate teachers’ job performance.

Five media organizations filed Freedom of Information Law requests for the ratings after The Los Angeles Times published similar data for 6,000 Los Angeles teachers in August.

The New York media organizations’ lawyer, David Schulz, praised Kern’s ruling.

“The court recognized the important principal that the public has a legitimate interest in the job performance of public employees, particularly in schools,” Schulz said.

The union argued that the value-added methodology is flawed and is based on standardized tests that were discredited after the state Education Department said they had become too easy to pass.

“The reports, which are largely based on discredited state tests, have huge margins of error and are filled with inaccuracies, will only serve to mislead parents looking for real information,” Mulgrew said.

Kern said she was not passing judgment on the wisdom of releasing the ratings.

“Although the teachers have an interest in these possibly flawed statistics remaining private, it was not arbitrary and capricious for the DOE to find that the privacy interest at issue is outweighed by the public’s interest in disclosure,” she said.

(Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


One Comment

  1. Simboo says:

    Lots of times, parents are proactive in educating their children. So if kids do well, it unfairly reflects on teachers performance, when it is actually the parents & kids who have worked hard. Lots of these teachers just try to pander to ESL kids, lowering education bar, so that all those illegal immigrant children can catch up.

  2. va22033 says:

    Remember back when you could kill someone and not worry about doing any time or even really being castigated by the American public. For example, I give you the leader of the left for years, the lion of the Senate, the murder, Senator Teddy “Good Bye Mary Jo” Kennedy. I heard it was reported that his last words to her were, “MJ gotta go – hope you can swim.”

    Ahhh, don’t you miss the good old days….

  3. The Truth says:

    Teachers should welcome this! If they have done their jobs then kudos but there are plenty of useless teachers. Why do the bad teachers get the same pay. Get rid of them and give good teachers a raise. The Teachers Union is a waste. Don’t be afraid unless you have something to hide!

  4. BloombergSucks says:

    We’re not, bandid. We don’t want INACCURATE data released. If it was worth anything we would give it to our students ourselves. It’s just a bunch of hypothetical and theoretical statistical B.S. that Bloombutt wasted millions of dollars creating. Now he has to justify it. I say bring it on. Let’s get this Mayor Idiot’s dirty laundry out in the open. I have been teaching students successfully for over 20 years and have a ton fo letters from students and parents thanking me. Does Mayor Midget really think i care what his numbers say?!?!?!?! BTW Bandid, it’s “Why IS the TEACHER’S union….”

  5. the bandid says:

    why are the teachers union afraid to have the names of the teachers performance?

Comments are closed.

More From CBS New York

Get Our Morning Briefs

Listen Live