Hartnett: Yankees Are Sabotaging Brett Gardner By Appeasing Derek Jeter

‘Hart of the Order’
By Sean Hartnett
» More Columns

On virtually any other ballclub, Brett Gardner would be the obvious choice for their lead-off hitter.  You would be hard-pressed finding someone more proficient in the role outside of Jose Reyes and Jacoby Ellsbury.

With Derek Jeter rehabbing in Tampa, this was the ideal time for the Yankees to dislodge their captain from the top of their order.  Now that Joe Girardi has declared that Jeter will re-assume the lead-off role when he returns, it will more difficult than ever for the Yankees to deal with an issue that they’ll one day have to admit: Derek Jeter is not an adequate leadoff man.

It’s almost as if the Yankees are afraid to disrupt the face of their franchise, fearing the reaction it would provoke.  Jeter isn’t a fearsome tiger in a cage but rather a very highly-compensated ballplayer who must accept whichever scenario his organization decides to use him.  It isn’t like Jeter has a leg to stand on either, as he’s clearly regressed since the midway point of the 2010 season yet was awarded with an above-market extension during the off-season.

That fact that Jeter will be paid an escalating $15M, $16M and $17M through 2013 makes it even harder for the Yankees to swallow the embarrassment of batting one of their highest earners eighth in the order or possibly the number nine hole.  It would be a financial and PR nightmare for Jeter to collect his 3,000th hit while batting in the lower portion of the Yankees’ lineup.  As outstanding of an accomplishment reaching 3,000 is, the Yankees want to play it up with pomp and circumstance so their fans will celebrate it as something larger than it actually is which of course translates into big bucks for the franchise.

Business aside, it’s almost impossible to quantify a logical reason why Gardner should have to make way for Jeter.  I’m certain that if the Yankees polled their fan base asking them which players are best suited to bat first and second, the overwhelming response would be: Gardner at lead-off and Curtis Granderson following him at number two.  Why should fans feel otherwise while Gardner is hitting equally well against right-handed and left-handed pitchers (.294 vs. RHP/.286 vs. LHP) while logging an on-base percentage that is 47 points superior to Jeter at .371.

If somehow Girardi and the Yankees’ brass believe that Jeter is still at the top of his game nearing 37, they are either deluded by his past accomplishments or the organization cares more about marketing than the product on the field.  Either way, it sends the wrong message to fans and betrays the credo their late owner George M. Steinbrenner III set forth in that winning goes beyond anything.  It isn’t Jeter’s birthright to bat at the top of the order nor does the superbly-performing Gardner deserve to be relegated to the bottom of the lineup.

It’s shocking that Gardner isn’t more highly thought of by the Yankee ‘powers that be.’  Seeing him constantly benched against left-handers despite registering a lofty .390 OBP against lefties drew ire from fans and questions about Girardi’s managerial acumen.  It’s hard to fathom a reason why Gardner would ever have to make way for a ballplayer as lousy as Andruw Jones.

All the moves the Yankees make seem almost an attempt to sabotage Gardner’s development as he was lifted from the lineup multiple times during their recent stretch of games.  Even when coming off the bench, Gardner collected a 12th inning game-winning hit in the final game of their homestand against the Texas Rangers.  He couldn’t have conceivably done more to deserve a sustained run as lead-off man.

The time has come to reward Gardner for the respect he’s earned among fans.  If Girardi were to actually pass him the baton to permanently bat lead-off, Gardner will run with it both in a literal and figurative sense.  Girardi must play the best hand dealt to him, otherwise it will be at a cost competitively.

Are the Yankees halting Gardner’s progress by restoring Jeter to lead-off when he returns from the DL?  Sound off below and send your tweets to @HartyLFC.

  • lydia

    It’s funny, a month ago almost everyone wanted Garner out of The Bronx, now he’s Rickey Henderson.
    I am a 28 years old doctor, mature and beautiful.and now I am seeking a good man who can give me real love , so i got a username Andromeda2002 on–s’e’ek’c’ou’ga’r.c óm–.it is the first and best club for y’ounger women and old’er men, or older women and y’ounger men,to int’eract with each other. Maybe you wanna ch’eck ‘it out or tell your friends!

  • business daily

    Granderson is batting .281 with 18 RBI in the 16-9 start..Its still relatively early but there have been troubling signs in the first month from a few of Longs other pupils namely Derek Jeter and Jorge Posada. Jeter and Posada though cant help but have people wondering if old age is setting in. He was also hit by a pitch..Jeter who did all that work with Long on changing to strideless mechanics has been up 95 times and owns just 23 hits only two for extra bases both doubles.

  • Berdell hardy

    By babying these plsyers, as well as, over-paying leads to enabling and cuddlling them This approach ultimately leads to problems down the road. Only in New York. Show some tough Love.

    The players are in a business. Thye New York Yankees are a business entity. Act like it.

  • dabooch

    Stir the pot, Gardner was headed for the trading block at the beginning of the season and now he’s a God send. Jeter was a great ball player all around, now he’s 37 and he still does what he does which is still good enough to be a front line player. A year or two from now Gardner will have plenty of opportunity to fall into the dominant role.

  • larry

    Gardner should be in the leadoff spot followed by Granderson. Batting Jeter second will only lead to more double plays. Jeter can’t get the ball in the air anymore.

  • Rich

    When Gardner learns how to bunt and run bases he would be an awesome lead-off hitter.

  • mike

    This is so ridiculous that it’s laughable and if the author is offended by that, I’m sorry. The Yankees put Gardner in the lead-off spot to start the season, not Derrick Jeter. Gardner did not hack it in any way shape or form so they dropped him to 9th where he has flourished in the past and he did again. In the meantime Jeter picked up and did well in the lead-off spot, especially leading off the first inning which is the only time the lead-off man actually leads off consistently. Now with Jeter hurt, Gardner is doing well leading off and when Jeter comes back, either he’ll do well leading off or Gardner will be back. How is he being “sabotaged”? Does this guy think that Yogi Berra was sabotaged because Joe D hit cleanup his last year even though Yogi outhit him by 50 pts and outslugged him by more than that? Does he think that Mantle should have been moved down to the bottom of the order in 65 because Tom Tresh was outhitting him? Come off it.

    • jadez

      STUPID remark.

      first off jeter never was the hitter that mantle or joe d were and if you dont understand jeter is finished as an offensive force and harms the team you just dont know much about baseball.

  • Roger

    The Yankess did the right thing by overpaying Jeter to resign him. Now Jeter needs to do the right thing by going public and saying that he will do anything to help the team be better.Unlike what Posada did earlier in the year.

  • Avi

    Jeter should recognize that his skills have eroded–it happens to everybody. Let’s see if he is the team player he likes to be portrayed as. He himself should step forward and tell the manager to place him anywhere in the batting order the manager sees fit. I would be surprised if he does. If the manager does it on his own, will Jeter just accept it and not complain. I wouldn’t count on it.

  • jeff

    I think the lead off spot is way over emphasized. JMO

  • traininvain

    It’s funny, a month ago almost everyone wanted Garner out of The Bronx, now he’s Rickey Henderson.

    • hartylfc

      Fans tend to be fickle. – Sean Hartnett

  • Charles

    This article sucks. Where do you guys find these writers?

blog comments powered by Disqus
Giving Tuesday
Charles Osgood Event

Listen Live