Dead Deal With David Einhorn Has Mets Fans Asking: What Happens To Jose Reyes?
New York Mets
Buy Mets Tickets
NEW YORK (WFAN/AP) — The owners of the Mets thought they had found their white knight. After months of what appeared to be friendly negotiations with a potential minority owner, though, the cash-strapped organization is left still looking for help.
The team said Thursday that the sale of a stake in the Mets to hedge fund manager David Einhorn for $200 million has fallen through, denying the flagging franchise the money needed to repay a loan from Major League Baseball and bolster its operating capital.
Plagued by key injuries, the Mets are likely to miss the playoffs for the fifth straight year. But they have shown signs of hope for the future — they were above .500 as late as Aug. 9, having played without David Wright, Ike Davis, Jose Reyes and Johan Santana for stretches of varying lengths. New York also traded closer Francisco Rodriguez and All-Star outfielder Carlos Beltran in July.
The No. 1 concern this offseason will be what to do with Reyes. The All-Star shortstop was having the best season of his career before two stints on the disabled list because of hamstring injuries.
New York passed up on trading him at the July 31 non-waiver deadline, but might not be able to afford the contract he is expected to command. Reyes, though, says the team’s current problems have no affect on him.
“I don’t worry about that, man,” Reyes said. “Right now, my concern is staying on the field and finishing the season strong.”
Understandably, the first question from most Mets fans was: How will the team pay for Reyes?
“We’re still hopeful we’ll figure something out with Jose,” one team official told the New York Post. “There are going to be a lot of factors that go into this. We’re not going to be empty-handed going in there.”
“It doesn’t change anything,” one of Reyes’ agents, Chris Leible, told the paper. “We weren’t going to do anything before the end of the season, anyway. So we just have to see where everything goes.”
Manager Terry Collins told his coaches the off-field issues would have no affect on their jobs.
“I said it means that when we walk into spring training next year and look on the top of the lockers, we have to get those guys as good as we can get them. That’s our jobs, no matter whose names are up there,” Collins said. “This has nothing to do with us.”
Mets owners will now try to sell shares of up to $20 million to family members and other potential investors without risking the possibility of losing a controlling interest in the team, a person familiar with the club’s plans told The Associated Press.
In a statement, the Mets’ ownership group, led by Fred Wilpon, said it has “provided additional capital to cover all 2011 losses and is moving forward with the necessary resources to continue to operate the franchise.”
“We are very confident in the team’s plans — both off and on the field,” Wilpon said. “We will engage with other individuals, some who have been previously vetted by Major League Baseball, along with other interested parties, regarding a potential minority investment into the franchise.”
The Mets announced they were looking for a minority owner after Wilpon, team president Saul Katz and chief operating officer Jeff Wilpon, embroiled in the Bernard Madoff ponzi scheme, were sued for $1 billion by the court-appointed trustee, Irving Picard, who has been charged with recovering losses for victims of the scam. A federal trial has been set for March 5.
Einhorn was selected from a group evaluated by Major League Baseball in May and the 42-year-old president of Greenlight Capital Inc. became a smiling presence at Citi Field as recently as Tuesday.
The deterioration of the deal he once called a win-win for both parties surprised Einhorn. He said Thursday that he believed the transaction was on track as recently as last week. Several modifications made last weekend, however, troubled him.
“Further negotiations would be pointless,” Einhorn said.
One example that Einhorn agreed to discuss because it had been leaked to the media was a clause he wanted that would provide assured approval of his being made majority owner by the other owners of major league teams if he exercised a right to take over the club in the future.
Einhorn said the Mets told him MLB would have a problem with that clause, so he went to Commissioner Bud Selig. He said Selig told him that MLB would not block a contract with a clause that required the other owners to approve him as majority owner.
But Einhorn said the clause was eliminated from the most recent proposal, and he accused the Mets of lobbying MLB to deny terms in the deal.
“After all, it wouldn’t make sense to invest $200 million into a team and then be denied the ability to exercise a negotiated option down the road due to the inability to obtain the required vote of other major league owners at that time,” Einhorn said.
Baseball transfer rules do not allow automatic or immediate approval for future owners.
Fred Wilpon told Sports Illustrated this season that his team was “bleeding cash” and could lose up to $70 million this year. It was uncertain how further drawing out the search for a cash infusion would affect the club.
The Mets’ first-year general manager, Sandy Alderson, told reporters at Triple-A Buffalo this week that the team’s payroll would be in the range of $100-110 million next year, down from more than $140 million this year.
Do you think the Mets will be able to re-sign Reyes? Let us know in the comments below…
(TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)