Charla Nash, Chimp Attack Victim, Says Conn. Gov. Malloy Knew Of Danger

HARTFORD, Conn. (CBSNewYork/AP) — The Connecticut woman who was severely mauled by a chimpanzee plans to sue the state for $150 million.

In February 2009, Charla Nash was attacked by Sandra Herold’s 200-pound pet chimp Travis as she was trying to lure it back into Herold’s house. It tore ripped off her nose, lips, eyelids and hands. The attack left her blinded.

Police shot the chimp dead.

Nash says Gov. Dannel Malloy, who was Stamford’s mayor at the time, should have had the animal locked up after a previous escape. She also blames state officials for not removing the chimp.

This weekend, she told a Connecticut newspaper: “I don’t know what the future’s going to bring, so I don’t get my hopes up.”

Nash’s lawyers say state environmental officials received reports and complaints about the danger and that the state was required by law to remove Travis, but did nothing.

She said the chimpanzee was “a known danger” in a residential area.

If her request to sue the state is denied by the Claims Commission, she can appeal to the legislature. Nash’s lawyers have hired a lobbyist to represent her if necessary at the state Capitol.

The state has “sovereign immunity” against most lawsuits unless such permission is granted.

“I hope that I do get my day in court,” Nash said.

Last year, the 57-year-old Nash had the full face transplant at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston in May with dozens of doctors during a 20 hour operation.

She is one of roughly a dozen recipients of face transplants worldwide.

Nash’s family is also suing Herold’s estate for $50 million. Herold died last year of an aneurysm.

Please share your thoughts below…

(TM and Copyright 2012 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2012 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

  • hannah

    why was grammar unchecked in this article? seems to me that the editor of CBS new york needs to do more work.

  • Moshe

    Probably millions of dollars were spent to save this woman’s life due to a bad decision of hers to interact with the animal, and now she wants $150 million because she wasn’t protected from her own bad choice. That’s gratitude for you.

  • Taybor

    But you knew he was a “know danger” because you interacted with him… so you willingly put your self in danger? You need to take responsibility for your own actions. I’m sorry that he attacked you but it is NOT the states fault that you chose to interact with a know danger.
    Please take responsibility for your own actions and stop driving us further and further in to a nanny state.

  • Jean

    Wild animals belong in the wild. Despite what some people believe, these animals cannot be domesticated and their nature will always come through sooner or later. People who stubbornly own them always find out and usually, the hard way. When people learn to respect the savage nature of these beautiful creatures maybe tragedies like this won’t happen.

  • JohnW9540

    Yet she willingly went to put this “dangerous ” animal into a cage.

  • Nick

    And this stupid hag that was aiding and abetting her prior friend in the feeding and care of the ape is an “innocent victim”.

    The rest of her skin should be peeled off. It’s just luck that the ape went after her and not some innocent child on the streets.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Giving Tuesday
Charles Osgood Event

Listen Live