By The Numbers: Who Was More Dominant — Babe Ruth Or Ty Cobb?
New York Yankees
Buy Yankees Tickets
Mets CentralShop for Mets Gear
Buy Mets Tickets
By Father Gabe Costa
» More Columns
Can we compare apples and oranges? Ty Cobb won 11 batting titles (BA) in 13 years while Babe Ruth copped 13 slugging (SLG) crowns in a 14-year stretch. No players in history have come close to these two immortals with respect to this type of hitting dominance.
Yet, I wonder, can we determine which of the two Hall of Famers was more dominant?
In the charts below, I take a look at Cobb’s yearly averages and compare them to the American League’s batting average (LBA) by calculating the ratio of the two numbers (BA/LBA). I also do the same with Ruth, replacing BA with SLG.
What do you think? Was Ruth more dominant as a slugger than Cobb was as a hitter?
Before I close, I take a look at Ruth’s two best SLG marks and compare them with those of Barry Bonds, while also looking at the runner-up in each league (NEXT) and the difference (DIFF) between the top two sluggers for those particular years. Note that it was in these four seasons alone that the .800 SLG barrier was reached.
By the way, Ruth leads all sluggers with a .690 career mark, outdistancing Bonds’ .607 by a good margin.
There have been many dominant players in the game, pitchers as well as hitters. But only one immortal has ever transcended the national pastime (by George!).
You May Also Be Interested In These Stories
- Rutgers Looking To Cap First Big Ten Season With Win Over UNC In Quick Lane Bowl
- Knicks Barely Put Up A Fight, Fall To 5-26 With Loss To Wizards
- Report: Wright Spoke To Slain NYPD Officer’s Sons For Over 15 Minutes On Phone
- Howie Rose On WFAN: Isles Fans Have Been As Loud This Year As I’ve Ever Heard Them