CBS2-Header-Logo WFAN 1010WINS WCBS tiny WLNYLogo

News

Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case

Case Was Heard By A 3-Judge Panel At The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court Of Appeals
Chris Christie (credit: Michael Loccisano
/Getty Images/ Entertainment)

Chris Christie (credit: Michael Loccisano
/Getty Images/ Entertainment)

Devils Central
Shop for Devils Gear
Buy Devils Tickets

NHL Scoreboard
NHL Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

NEW YORK SPORTS HEADLINES

Get our weekday morning briefs direct from the WFAN newsroom
Sign Up
Giants Central
Buy Giants Tickets
Sun Sep.21
Home vs Houston Texans
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
Thu Sep.25
Away vs Washington Redskins
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
Sun Oct.5
Home vs Atlanta Falcons
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
Sun Oct.12
Away vs Philadelphia Eagles
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
 
Shop for Giants Gear
NFL Scoreboard
NFL Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries
Islanders Central
Shop for Islanders Gear
Buy Islanders Tickets

NHL Scoreboard
NHL Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

Jets Central
Buy Jets Tickets
Mon Sep.22
Home vs Chicago Bears
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
Sun Sep.28
Home vs Detroit Lions
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
Sun Oct.5
Away vs San Diego Chargers
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
Sun Oct.12
Home vs Denver Broncos
findticketsbtn Federal Court Nixes New Jersey Appeal In Sports Betting Case
 
Shop for Jets Gear
NFL Scoreboard
NFL Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries
Knicks Central
Shop for Knicks Gear
Buy Knicks Tickets

NBA Scoreboard
NBA Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

Mets Central
Shop for Mets Gear
Buy Mets Tickets

MLB Scoreboard
MLB Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

Nets Central
Shop for Nets Gear
Buy Nets Tickets

NBA Scoreboard
NBA Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

Rangers Central
Shop for Rangers Gear
Buy Rangers Tickets

NHL Scoreboard
NHL Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

Yankees Central
Shop for Yankees Gear
Buy Yankees Tickets

MLB Scoreboard
MLB Standings
Team STATS
Team Schedule
Team Roster
Team Injuries

NEWARK, N.J. (CBSNewYork/AP) — Not so fast.

A federal appeals court dealt another blow to New Jersey’s efforts to legalize sports gambling Tuesday, upholding a ruling that the state’s betting law conflicts with federal law and shouldn’t be implemented.

The case was heard by a three-judge panel at the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, and the state could seek to have the case re-heard by the full appeals court. But Tuesday’s ruling more likely means New Jersey’s last chance to legalize sports gambling is to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.

A spokesman for Gov. Chris Christie didn’t immediately return a message seeking comment Tuesday, but in the past Christie has said he would go to the nation’s highest court if necessary.

Voters passed a sports betting referendum in 2011, and last year New Jersey enacted a law that limited bets to the Atlantic City casinos and the state’s horse racing tracks. Bets wouldn’t be taken on games involving New Jersey colleges or college games played in the state. Christie said at the time that he hoped to grant sports betting licenses by early this year, but those plans were put on hold.

The NFL, NBA, NHL, Major League Baseball and the NCAA sued the state last year, and the NCAA moved several of its championship events out of New Jersey, though it later relented.

The leagues said the betting law could harm the sanctity of the games. In a court deposition, MLB commissioner Bud Selig said he was “appalled” by Christie’s actions.

Attorneys for the state had attacked the 1992 federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act on several constitutional levels. They argued the law unfairly “grandfathered” Nevada, Oregon, Montana and Delaware, which each had some form of sports gambling at the time, and said the law violated state sovereignty and equal protection provisions and trampled the authority of state legislatures under the 10th Amendment.

In March, U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp ruled that some of the questions raised in the case were novel, but he suggested the best way to change the U.S. law was to get Congress to repeal or amend it.

Tuesday’s appellate ruling reinforced Shipp’s view.

“We are cognizant that certain questions related to this case — whether gambling on sporting events is harmful to the games’ integrity and whether states should be permitted to license and profit from the activity — engender strong views,” judges wrote. “But we are not asked to judge the wisdom of PASPA or of New Jersey’s law, or of the desirability of the activities they seek to regulate. We speak only to the legality of these measures as a matter of constitutional law … New Jersey’s sports wagering law conflicts with PASPA and, under our Constitution, must yield.”

You May Also Be Interested In These Stories

(TM and © Copyright 2013 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2013 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)