Says Many Gang Members Were Coming After His Family

UNIONDALE, N.Y. (CBS 2) — He was arrested for protecting his property and family.

But it’s how the Long Island man did it that police say crossed the line.

He got an AK-47 assault rifle, pulled the trigger and he ended up in jail, reports CBS 2’s Pablo Guzman.

George Grier said he had to use his rifle on Sunday night to stop what he thought was going to be an invasion of his Uniondale home by a gang he thought might have been the vicious “MS-13.” He said the whole deal happened as he was about to drive his cousin home.

“I went around and went into the house, ran upstairs and told my wife to call the police. I get the gun and I go outside and I come into the doorway and now, by this time, they are in the driveway, back here near the house. I tell them, you know, ‘Can you please leave?’ Grier said.

Grier said the five men dared him to use the gun; and that their shouts brought another larger group of gang members in front of his house.

“He starts threatening my family, my life. ‘Oh you’re dead. I’m gonna kill your family and your babies. You’re dead.’ So when he says that, 20 others guys come rushing around the corner. And so I fired four warning shots into the grass,” Grier said.

Grier was later arrested. John Lewis is Grier’s attorney.

“What he’s initially charged with – A D felony reckless endangerment — requires a depraved indifference to human life, creating a risk that someone’s going to die. Shooting into a lawn doesn’t create a risk of anybody dying,” Lewis said.

Grier said he knew Nassau County Police employ the hi-tech “ShotSpotter” technology in his area and that the shooting would bring police in minutes. Cops told Guzman he was very cooperative.

Grier also said he was afraid the gang outside his house was the dreaded MS-13. And Nassau County Police Lt. Andrew Mulraine, head of the gang unit, said MS-13 has 2,000 members in the county.

“They’re probably the most organized. They almost have a military hierarchy within the gang, so they are the most organized gang we encounter on a daily basis,” Mulraine said.

You may think a person has the right to defend their home. But the law says you can only use physical force to deter physical force. Grier said he never saw anyone pull out a gun, so a court would have to decide on firing the gun.

Police determined Grier had the gun legally. He has no criminal record. And so he was not charged for the weapon.

That ShotSpotter technology pinpoints where a gun has been fired within 35 feet. Police said it also detected two other shootings in nearby Roosevelt that night.

Comments (1,305)
  1. phat says:

    If the police confiscate all the legal weapons, all that’s left are the criminals with weapons. Crime goes up. Panic goes up. Police power goes up. So long as the problem is never solved, police power continues to increase until the gangs start wearing badges.

    1. Terry says:

      In my experience, they are the ones with the badges.

  2. Steve says:

    Anyone willing to run for office vowing zero tolerance for gangs will get my vote, and millions of others. Campaign support, too. I guarantee it.

    1. baoynne dweller says:

      Not all easterners are liberals. We are conservatives and support Arizona’s right to defend its border. There are many of us… only those abortion-loving-gay-marriage supporters are against it. The gang were in his lawn and they were threatening him and his family…. what would the police want? Wait for someone to sneak from behind and stab him?

  3. NunnaYourBusiness says:

    About 17 years ago, in El Paso, I took out a twice-convicted drug dealer who had other felony convictions. The legal system failed me and the guy I killed. My shotgun didn’t. Problem solved.

  4. allysa says:

    yeah, i don’t even know what to say. all of you guys have the right idea. i probably would have been too scared to NOT shoot all of them. haha. he definitely did the right thing.

  5. conjuice says:

    No jury in the world will convict this man, not even in liberal New York. The disgusting thing is that he has to waste ANY time or money defending his actions in court. Welcome to Obama-ville. This country has gotten WAY to friendly with criminals, and tramples on the rights of law abiding citizens to do it. Its disgusting.

  6. Frank G. says:

    If there were 20 gang members around him, he should have been able to use lethal force do to a disparity of force that existed (one guy with gun versus 20 punks, some issuing death threats to him and his family). Disparity of force is recognized in the legal community as a factor in determining what “reasonable force” is. One armed guy up against 20 guys that can physically kill you, and have said they will, with hands allows the one guy to defend himself with the gun. Period. He asked them to leave, more show up and threaten him. I’d have taken out as many as possible.

  7. Paul says:

    The joy of living in Florida is that if someone is on your property and you feel threatened, you don’t have to waste good bullets in the dirt.

    1. bunky says:

      As a Florida resident I second your comment.

    2. Bran says:

      Living in Florida you can also legally own a REAL machine gun. I know because I own 3 of them, 2 M16’s and an Uzi.

      1. Steve says:

        We can a lot of toy’s down HERE

  8. Ex-Long Islander in Seattle says:

    Defending your family is defined by law enforcement as “depraved indifference”. What, pray tell, do they call M13?

  9. Cole says:

    Two factual errors with this story: 1) An actual AK-47 is illegal unless you have a federal permit, so this gentleman had a look-a-like; 2) AK and AK-47 Look-a-likes fire a medium-powered round, not high-powered.

    1. xcon says:

      Cole you don’t know what you are talking about.
      It fires a 7.62 x 39 mm round at 2400 fps.
      As long as it isn’t full auto it’s legal.

      1. Ballistic doc says:

        Yes, xcon, that’s a medium powered round and if you get it to 2400 fps you are either a reloading stud or your chronometer is very generous. Technically, both the AK and the M16 rounds are medium powered. Not something to take on a deer hunt unless your primary weapon is your truck bumper.

    2. Chris says:

      Cole: at LEAST one factual error in your post… An actual AK-47 is illegal unless it is Semi-Auto Only OR you pay a federal TAX STAMP.

      No such thing as a federal permit.

      Also, AKs and AK-47 lookalikes fire various rounds, such as 5.56 NATO, 7.62×39, 5.45×45 and have been chambered for other rounds as well. Do some research before you open your mouth and shove your foot in trying to call someone else out.

  10. Henry says:

    I’m so happy I live in Virginia. But no matter where I live, I’d rather be alive and face 12 jurors, than be dead and face six feet of dirt.

  11. SockRayBlue says:

    Most likely the New Jersey laws is such that a weapon outside the home is the problem. Now if those bad guys were to enter the house then he’d have been able to whack them in a more controlled way such as using the doorway to “funnel ’em in” so to speak.

    One musn’t let the heat of the moment control them. Planning is of utmost importance.

  12. Robert says:

    I’ll bet some dumb jury full of air-heads will find him guilty too!

    1. wert says:

      A question? Does the law imply that the gang member/s would have to shoot him first before he could apply equal force? So in essence the gun-wielding criminal gets the first shot before you can defend yourself in kind? Just incredible

  13. Noah Vaile says:

    “You may think a person has the right to defend their home. But the law says you can only use physical force to deter physical force.”
    Bad news for self-defense. Stupid DA! Criminals have the ability and the stated desire to do you harm. If they don’t actually pull a gun he has to fight them off bare handed? All 20? Gang members?

  14. Chuck_Indy says:

    Hey Nassau County Police – can you pinpoint me to within 35 feet? Show your butt up on my lawn and I teach you about defending proprty rights!

  15. DrFinch says:

    Thank God that rifle wasn’t smuggled across the border to Mexico!

  16. susystin says:

    bill e. bob: have a feeling it wasn’t illegals that were causing the problem, if you know what I mean. Could this all be deliberate too? You know, take away the guns because they are so dangerous? Yeah right.

  17. Calvin Hobbes says:

    The cops are worthless. Defend your home and your life at any cost. They could care less if you get mutliated, gutted, and murdered.

  18. Tristan says:

    The guy is a hero and i would have done the same thing. This whole situation is a joke.

  19. Bobby says:

    The courts have already ruled that the police cannot be held responsible for your safety. Wise up people and elect officials who make laws that allow you to protect yourselves. Google the “make my day” law in Oklahoma. Under that law, this man would have been within his right shoot that ahole threatening him and his family. Until that option exist, those criminals will continue this threatening behavior..

  20. Gotta be kidding me. says:

    Just what you would expect from the incompetent government. Fully investigate what happened and then arrest the victim.

  21. Paul from Texas says:

    they woulda been conting bodies west of the Brazos

    1. Monte Beckham says:

      Tell them bad #%$ M13 boys to come to West Texas.We got a special treat for em.

    2. Heartland Patriot says:

      Now THAT is an accurate statement concerning self-defense in Texas…

  22. Bill McLean says:

    “high powered AK-47” – It is actually a very low powered weapon.

    1. booby says:

      not really…..not a high powered rifle but by no means low powered

    2. sniper says:

      It will get the job done believe me as I was shot with one 40 years ago. It went through my hemet and took a chunck out of my head. I just hope this guy had a thirty round mag so he wouldn’t have to reload as often.

  23. Hal L. says:

    Lots of people lose their thinking when they hear of a citizen with a gun. This is an example. The AK-47 is not a high powered rifle, it fires the rather anemic 7.62 X 39mm. And I’m sorry he got arrested but if he had not taken action he and his family might be dead. In fact if the cops take his gun those thugs might return and he’ll be helpless.

    1. mag386 says:

      I totally agree with you Hal, besided the cops would have taken an hour to arrive had he not fired the rifle…

  24. bill e. bob says:

    we only liberals to blame for allowing millions of illegal aliens into our country, now they are taking our country from us

  25. Kate Stonehedge says:

    “high powered AK-47” There is no such thing as a “high powered” AK-47. And it probably really wasn’t an AK-47 but maybe an AK-47S.

    Like good “journalism” the Devil is in the details. The weak 7.62×39 (AK-47) bullet was designed to pierce 2 wool winter overcoats. Otherwise it was selected because it was light, cheap and easy to carry. (The some sort of criteria used to select the 5.56 or .223 M-16 round.) The average deer rifle is
    much more “powerful”.

    An AK-47 is a “machine gun”, the “S” on the end of the number means that the gun is “semi-automatic” only. Now we all know that the Associated Press has spent years muddying the waters about this but its really simple. Machine guns shoot as long as the trigger is pulled. Semi-automatics fire one shot for each trigger pull.

    Now there are only a few literally bankrupt states where these stupid laws still exist New York is one of them. (Hint, look for Democrats running things into the ditch.)

    The argument that the guy would rather protect his family than just be the topic of another unionized police report is persuasive to anyone with any experience with criminals, with badges and without.

    1. Eric says:

      the 7.62 known here as the 308 winchester is a very powerful round used for hunting large game Elk Bear etc.
      don’t be mistaken this round goes right through kevelar unlike the nato 556. or .223 if you like.

      1. Ballistic doc says:

        AK’s do not shoot the .308, genius. You are uninformed when it comes to ammo. The 7.62×39 is the AK round, the 308 military designation is 7/.62×51 and far more powerful. No, the AK round isn’t much to brag about. Get it straight before you post.

      2. Anon says:

        careful Eric… the 7.62x39mm (what the AK uses) is NOT the same as a .308 Winchester. The 7.62x51mm and the .308 Winchester are the same.

      3. Outback Jon says:

        Wrong 7.62. The 7.62 that an AK-style rifle uses is a 7.62×39. The .308 Winchester that you are referring to is a 7.62×51. Very different cartridges with very different ballistic properties.

      4. NetRanger says:

        The 7.62×39 is a round much less powerful that a .308 Winchester (7.62×51). The 7.62×39 is very much, ballistic wise, like a 30-30 only they shoot spire point bullets. While still pretty powerful, they only deliver a little more than half the “power” of a 308. A 308 pushes a 180gr bullet about around 3200 fps while the 7.62×39 pushes a 150gr bullet at about 2800. Good enough for shorter range. At the ranges we’re talking about (100ft) an AK is probably not much different from anything else. But, that bullet will travel on through most anything. Rifles are not for the city, unless frangibles are used. I do have a load that I used in the 30-06 (the predecessor of the 308) where I push thin jacketed, light .308 diameter hollow point pistol bullets to the edge. They literally explode when they hit anything. Turn to explosive dust at 4000fps. Those would be a good load to use in town. I use them to decapitate stray dogs that attack my cattle. They’d work on the thugs. There is a reason they have such laws in New York. The people that buy off the politicians don’t like their people shot up. So, they pass the gun laws to keep the sheople in line and docile. When NYC burns to the ground and all the two legged rats flee, order (and self defense) will return.

      5. petie3 says:

        The 7.62×39 is an assault rifle cartridge, a downloaded version engineered to cycle rapidly and without fail. The 7.62×51 NATO is the 308 Winchester which is completely different; and I wish we had a battle rifle in 7.62 NATO. Oh right, we did. The M14 and I bet 3/4 of the troops in Afghanistan would rather have an M14 than an M16 or an M4.

      6. Chris says:

        The 7.62×51 (or .308 Winchester) is NOT the same thing that the AKS is chambered for. The AKS is chambered for the 7.62×39 round, which is an entirely different cartridge.

      7. Joe says:

        You are confused and have the wrong 7.62 – Ak is 7.62×39, much smaller than the .308 (7.62×51). Learn before you post.

      8. Norm56 says:

        No, that is not true. The AK-47S uses 7.72X39, a lower powered round than the .308 deer rifle, also know as the 7.62 NATO (7.72.51). The only commonality is the 7.62 diameter, which is essentially a .30 cal. cartridge size is smaller as is the powder charge.

      9. TRUTH says:

        Actually the 7.62 (.308) you speak of is the 7.62×51 NATO – much more powerful than the Warsaw Pact AK-47 7.62×39. Get your facts straight.

      10. Joe says:

        The 308 Winchester is a 7.62 x 51….. a whole lot more bang than a 7.62 x 39.

      11. jerri7 says:

        The AK does NOT shoot the 308 Winchester / NATO round, and is NOT a “very powerful” rifle. It is a a relatively low-powered rifle, not well suited even for deer hunting. The writer’s comment serves only to further the lies of the pathological anti-gun crowd.

      12. Andrew says:

        Leave the gun facts to those who know the actual facts.

        7.62×39 – the round used in SKS, AK, and other commiebloc rifles.
        7.62×51 – the round used in the M60, M14, M24, and numerous other US and NATO designs.
        7.62×54 – the round used in the Mosin Nagant, PK, and other commiebloc rifles and machine guns.

        All will penetrate body armor nicely, at least the soft stuff. BTW, so does 5.56×45, the stuff you were poo-pooing. Any will do the job nicely.

    2. toodleooass says:

      Jeff Cooper (R.I.P) would disagree with you on the AK round.

  26. Dr Millgram says:

    He did the right thing

  27. Flying Al says:

    He was significantly outnumbered and feared for his life. The gang had opportunity and ability to do what they wanted if he did not have the gun. It would be justifiable if he planted a few of these animals.

  28. patspeak says:

    Amen ellian!

  29. inflyover says:

    This is THE prime example of why government today is not trusted. Too often those in government see no problem in protecting the criminal at the expense of the law-abiding citizen.

  30. wasr-10 says:

    when seconds count, the police are only minutes away

  31. Henry on LI says:

    Cap ’em, F~ those gang bangers

  32. Leroy says:

    Remember: When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!

    1. RufusVonDufus says:

      Sad, but so very true!

    2. Anapa says:

      That’s a great comment!

  33. San Diego Steve says:

    It is a sad day indeed when a man defending his home and family from a gang of vicious criminals goes to jail and the thugs and gangsters go free. Where were the police when this family was in danger? We will see if any jury will convict this brave man for his actions in trying to keep his family safe. It is time that law-abiding Americans use the ballot box to oust all politicians, judges and officials who condone this perverted form of “law enforcement.”

    1. Greg says:


      The big story here isn’t about the honest citizen who got arrested, it’s about how come this gang not only exists but got the chance to grow to such alarming numbers! Where are the blazing headlines about that? There should be non-stop coverage of this gang problem and who was so sloppy in leadership to allow it to continue! You won’t see it because some sympathetic throwback news crews would rather avoid the issue and focus on Lindsay Lohan, Tiger Woods, and other celebrity gossip. You’ve got incompetent journalism and indifferent leadership going on here and we the people live in terror in our communities.

    2. Alfred Newman says:

      If I’m not mistaken, his congrssional rep is Carolyn McCarthy. She is the staunch anti-gun rights statist who was elected on the anti-gun hysteria following the Long Island Rail Road massacre.
      Keep voting Democrat, suckers.

  34. SockRayBlue says:

    Hopefully the man asks for a jury trial and his “peers” see it his way.

    1. harborite says:

      He will, and they will.

    2. Dean says:

      Too bad a jury of commy liberal gun hating New Yorkers will probably convict this poor guy. Can not expect much else from any state electorate that keeps electing the people they do.

      1. OMEN3 says:

        As a Conservative non-communist New Yorker I take offense to that remark!

        However, as a Conservative non-communist New Yorker I must also concede that I’m surrounded by people who are either deranged, mentally challenged, or programmed automatons.

        There are SANE people in the state. Unfortunately, we’re VASTLY outnumbered.

    3. Al says:

      Just leave New York. I did eight years ago and don’t regret it.

    4. MiddleBear says:

      A group of twenty gang members threatenibf this man posed a deadly threat. Thus, the use of a rifle to protect his family is justified. Only anti Second Amendment liberals could think otherwise. No wonder the crime rate is so high in NY.

      1. factsaregood says:
        sort by total violent crime. NYC is ranked something like 55th in the nation with less violent crime per 100,000 people than cites like Tulsa, Kansas City, Oklahoma City, Omaha, Witchita and even Anchorage.

      2. Alfred E Newman says:

        Numbers don’t lie but liars use numbers.

    5. Doc Holiday says:

      Move to Texas man. Here you were just protecting your family. PD show up… Sure….. to offer you a job and pin a medal to your chest.

      1. Heartland Patriot says:

        You know, it does depend on WHERE in Texas you live…the cities are all controlled by liberals…they’d try to railroad you to make themselves look good to the criminals, like Mayor Daley of Chicago…but, in small town Texas, you are probably pretty safe defending yourself. Man, I HATE liberals.

    6. Terry says:

      Too bad he missed.

  35. umpcam says:

    He should have shot as many as he could!

  36. Yankee Dave says:

    He understood what the law and courts do not. You cannot wait for the cops to arrive. In Texas we would have had a bunch of dead thugs and a letter of contratulations instead of jail time for the victim. Now you have twenty thugs out to get a citizen that they wanted to enslave.

  37. typical white person says:

    Those are some nice AK’s!

    1. pompey says:

      In SC we don’t shoot into the lawn…………………..and my AK looks better!

      1. AR Guy says:

        Pompey, I’m in SC too. I don’t own an AK-47, as I would rather choose my target and hit it than just spray and pray. Granted, your AK could be more finely tuned than the average, so I give you benefit of the doubt. However, it needs to be said that law-abiding gun owners in SC do just that …abide by the law…and only use lethal force when met with a similar threat to yourself or others. You don’t shoot to defend your property. You don’t shoot to scare. When legal and necessary, you choose your target, consider the safety of innocents, and neutralize the threat. Please don’t give the impression that South Carolinians are a bunch of trigger-happy rednecks. Those who own and/or carry legally are correctly exercising their 2nd Amendment rights. I don’t know the law in NY, so I can’t comment on Mr. Grier’s actions. I can, however, understand them. Oh…BTW…get yourself a Mossberg 590 for inside threats, and a good AR-15 for when the SHTF.

        1. NotAVictim says:

          Here in Idaho, we have Open Carry laws. We have the 2nd most lenient gun laws in the Nation…and the LOWEST violent crime rate. California has the strictest gun laws…and the HIGHEST violent crime rate. New York has strict gun laws…and high violent crime rate. Doesn’t take a genius to connect those dots. In Idaho, you don’t get many armed home invasions or violent crimes. Why? Because the Criminals and Gang-bangers…who get guns no matter how many laws you pass…think twice before invading a home and family here. We all have lots of guns…and we all shoot very well.

  38. southman says:

    stupid cops are worth nothing

    1. shooter says:

      Southman – Cops don’t MAKE the laws…they are legally bound to ENFORCE them.

      If you don’t like a particular law, elect a representative you believe either will not pass stupid laws like that in the first place, or will do something to get rid of them.

      1. Vic Potts says:

        “Southman – Cops don’t MAKE the laws…they are legally bound to ENFORCE them.”

        Sounds like the same excuse the SS troops tried when attempting to justify killing Jews.. It was the law and I was ordered to do it…

        At some point you have to say NO…

      2. Tim says:

        why aren’t border agents legally bound to enforce Federal Immigration Law?

      3. Panzer says:

        Hey shooter is the law tells you and your lib cops to consfiscate all of the weapons in law abiding citizens homes would you do it? Or would you say,….uhmmm, that is a breach of the second amendment? Damn lemmings or sheeple they’re everywhere even walking on two legs.

      4. Drugshooter says:

        HEY – Police AND Prosecutors have discretion in carrying out their duties. Nuff said.

      5. geekonearth says:

        They are not legally bound to enforce anything. Any individual, at any time, may choose to not violate this man’s rights. If that means getting a productive job that does not depend on taxes, so be it; the police are obviously not protecting or serving him anyway.

      6. Shoot to Thrill says:

        Damn straight, shooter!

      7. Bob Boneur says:

        You’re right, cops don’t make the laws, but they are legally obligated to Suck Satan’s Cokk

      1. Flit Andersen says:

        Panzer/drugshooter/bobby; Shooter is absolutely correct. We are supposed to be a nation of laws and the LAST thing we want is a police force selectively enforcing those laws. We get the government – and thus the laws – we deserve.

        When was the last time YOU confronted a Lib in mixed company with better arguments? Showed them up? Full time job.

        That’s what it takes.

    2. Glammer says:

      Don’t blame the cops, they’re just following a misguided law brought to you by liberals.

    3. Paul in PA says:

      The DA who arrested this guy is the one who belongs in jail. This is precisely why guns are flying off the shelves … we all know the authorities have little interest in carrying out their responsibilities unless it suits them and were all on our own. Shame on New Yorkers for electing cowards like this.

    4. RIGHTTOLIFE says:

      Stupid cops…fool politicians……and the idiots who vote them into office are all to blame for the injustice that literally handcuffs a law abiding citizen and prevents him from defending his own life, the life of his family, and his property from these animals!

      Shoot the bastards that threaten your life and come what may!!

  39. Tom Powers says:

    What a freaking farce the laws in this country have become! Mr. Grier should have shot as many of those savages as possible, and he should have gotten a medal for it! I wonder what the immigration status was on the majority of those savages? How about criminal records? For God’s sake, lock up the criminals and leave the law abiding citizens alone!

    1. Tracy says:

      Could not agree more!

  40. Justin says:

    The gun was legal. He was protecting his family. It he had waited for someone the pull out a gun, he would be dead. Common sense tells us he did what was right. But the law sometimes has no common sense.

    1. Deb says:

      Aristotle said, “Law is mind without reason.” Seems to apply here.

  41. pete says:

    Sounds to me he was in the right.

    1. Arkansas Libertarian says:

      Damn straight.

      1) In many states, you’re allowed to use self defense not just in the home, but the curtilage as well. (Area surrounding your home.)
      2) A verbal treat of murder should have the same penalty as an attempted murder. You threaten to kill my family, you’re paid for. End of story.

      If his neighborhood had 20 more armed men just like Mr. Grier, the gang problem would go away.

      1. Conservative Gun-lover says:

        Preach it man

      2. Flit Andersen says:

        Slight correction: 20 more armed men EQUALLY WILLING to use those weapons.

      3. james says:

        I’m from that area. I moved away to SC about 15 years ago. We have the Castle Doctrine here- your home is your castle; you have a right to self preservation. I encourage all that can to get out of NY, NJ, MA etc. Things aren’t going to change anytime soon up there.

  42. Scott Wade says:

    Its a sad day when someone threatens your family’s life, you defend it, and you get arrested. I would have done the same thing.

    1. Alfred Newman says:

      In the People’s Republic of New York, You have the duty to retreat.
      Better to be judged by 12.

      1. Bob says:

        Yall ought to come on down to Florida. We don’t have to retreat. We have a “stand your ground” law that says you can take defensive action if it comes your way. It used to be we had to run and hide, but after the bad guys chased an innocent all the way down the street, into his own house, and found him hiding in the closet, then shot him, we’d had enough. No more retreat. Only thing is, we must carry concealed, no open carry, yet. But the longer the concealed carry law is on our books, the crime rate just keeps going down, down, down. Heck, yall come on down, take the class on concealed carry ($140.00) and get your CCW nine days later, unless you’re a felon, wacko, dope head, that sort of thing.

    2. Talbot says:

      I would have shot the gang bangers. In for a penny, in for a pound.

      1. Gunslinger says:

        Absolutely right Talbot

    3. Jaison says:

      I totally agree.

      Scott Wade
      Its a sad day when someone threatens your family’s life, you defend it, and you get arrested. I would have done the same thing.

      1. Melissa says:

        Any true man who loves his family would’ve. Heck, I’d have done the same thing! America is truly spiraling towards failure at a sharp angle when a man can’t even protect his own family without his rights being violated… 2ND AMENDMENT PEOPLE!!!!

    4. Ralph says:

      20 or more gang bangors on you property! What were they doing there….trying to sell magazine subscriptions? Don’t think so! You think a 6 shooter would have got them to leave? LOL

    5. Brad says:

      Where can I donate to the Defense Fund? Total BS.

    6. Chris says:

      If he has a decent lawyer, they would argue that threats by a group that size represent a real and present threat and that lethal force is justified.

    7. Roger says:

      Right on, I would of shot them though, threating familly is wrong

      1. Bob says:

        One guy vs 20? Nah, they’d killed him. He did best by shooting into the ground He couldn’t have gotten them all.

      2. Chuckles says:

        I don’t know. A 30 round clip would have made a pretty good dent in their numbers.

      3. focuszone says:

        And just what do you think would have happened to this man and his family if he’d actually killed any real-life MS13 gangsters? You’re talking about an organization with thousands of members, one that protects its own and has never hesitated to use violence and murder. Only an idiot would believe, ‘well, if I shoot a couple, the rest will just leave me alone’. One man taking on MS13 with his AK isn’t going to scare them- just get himself killed, along with anyone standing nearby.

  43. Mark says:

    Filthy. Maggot. Pigs. May they rot for what they’ve done to this country!

    1. Eric says:

      Do not blame the police…blame your liberal ass city leaders who passed this law…Shame on NYC

  44. who cares says:

    Sounds like the god damned police state is out to keep its stranglehold on the People, aided by TREASONOUS Government.

    So he has to wait till theyve taken hus family hostage and are in his house to DEFEND his family?

    Heres the answer – any State which has, in acts of TREASON, violated the Constuttional limitations placed on them by depriving Citizens of their RIGHTS, loses their right to be a State.

    1. Mark says:

      Sounds good to me!

    2. Pompey says:

      …do you actually consider NY a part of America?

  45. S. Arcasm says:

    What exactly is a “high-powered” AK-47? Does it come with an extra-long extension cord or something?

    1. Yankee Dave says:

      That question is just perfect. Thanks!

      1. Patrick says:

        Amen brother….the ‘was’ the right question.

        (lifetime NRA Member)

    2. SockRayBlue says:

      Something to do with “sensationalism” in the news. I’ve had “high powered” Mexican food which can be just as dangerous or is that lethal?

      1. AB says:

        That would be considered a “dirty bomb”.

      2. Art House says:

        Also known as “Man on the Run”

      3. DB says:

        LOL! Ya’ll just made my day.

    3. shooter says:

      To the liberal press, a firearm is “high powered” if it is a semi-auto, or has a magazine with a capacity of 10 rounds, or it has a bayonet lug, or a pistol grip, or is colored black.

      In Washington DC, if your pistol has a magazine capacity of more than 13 rounds, you now have a MACHINE GUN!

      Come to think of it…anything more than a muzzle loader is “high powered” to these ignoramuses.

    4. warmonger9 says:

      That is hillarious!

    5. Bill Smith says:

      Yes, I was wondering the same thing. An actual AK-47 is hardly “high-powered.” Also, unless this homeowner has one manufactured before 1984, and paid LOTS of money for it, his “AK-47” is not capable of automatic fire, and is therefore NOT an AK-47 at all, but a look-alike wannabe.

      1. But seriously says:

        To be more accurate, no ak-47 has been made since 1959. Kalishnakov updated the design and later versions are called AK-M’s (modern).
        Stupid stupid cops for arresting him. That many people making threats is force.

      2. toodleooass says:

        An AK, firing a 7.63 mm (essentially 30 caliber) round is the poster child for “high-powered.” That’s why AK’s (and hunting rifles) are better than M16s/M4s. You don’t know everything.

      3. Dread Cthulhu says:

        It isn’t powerful as far as rifles go, but I would point out that even a .22 short round can carry a quarter mile under the right circumstances… and what goes up must come down.

      4. Bill Smith says:

        You know nothing.
        The diameter of the bullet has exactly zero to do with the “power” of the cartridge. The AK is NOT a high powered weapon as any knowledgeable firearms person will tell you.

    6. UpChuck.Liberals says:

      It’s more powerful than a slingshot?

    7. S Arcasm Jr. says:

      Never heared of a low powered AK47.

    8. Shoot to Thrill says:

      ‘High Powered’ is news code for ‘OMG a gun.”

      But everyone knows that high powered means it kills fools in your front yard threatening to kill your babies. =P

    9. Tom Genin says:

      Apparently the author never heard of a .338 Laupua Magnum. These are the same anti-gun yucks who would call an Uzi “hiigh powered” not knowing it’s the same 9mm round that micro handguns use.

    10. james says:

      I love the articles picture. All those evil “assault weapons”.

  46. steven b says:

    God Bless Texas,,, where you still have the right to defend your life, family, home.

    1. SockRayBlue says:

      Steven b….I live in south Texas and a High Five for that comment.

    2. Pompey says:

      …what you are actually saying is that you live in America…..I don’t thinks people seriously consider NY to be America.

      1. Shoot to thrill says:

        LOLZA Nice shot!

    3. azcalamity says:

      Amen, Steven! If Texas leaves the Union, will you take us ( Arizona) with you?

      1. XJRacerik says:

        Actually Texas never joined the union. Canadians STILL know more about American history than Americans do-lol! Did you know we burnt down your FIRST white house when WE won the war of 1812??

        1. Kev says:

          Yeah, The British did. Assuming you’re just another Canadian trying to take credit for stuff Canadians never did (like invent the telephone but that’s a discussion for another time), there may have been Canadians along for the ride, but they were marching under the BRITISH flag, following orders from BRITISH commanders in a BRITISH operation. Nice try, but no points for this round of History Revisionism.

          Do you know why Washington DC got burned? (and not very well, I might add)

          WE BURNED WHAT YOU NOW CALL TORONTO RIGHT TO THE FRIGGING GROUND and Governor-General Prevost cried about it.

          And by the way, after they burned Washington, those same British troops surrendered to a thunderstorm. So I wouldn’t crow too loudly.

      2. Richard says:

        Great Point!!!

    4. ByteRider says:

      Arizona, too, Steven… we have a conceal-carry law here… anyone can carry a weapon, concealed or not. Yeah… we don’t get TOO many problems ’round these parts… I had a friend who blew away a mexican for robbing him at an ATM about 3 years ago… my friend lost 2 fingers (grabbed the gunman’s gun) but did keep his life. All on the ATM camera, of course.

      1. obummer says:

        You also have Sherrif Joe!

  47. Ron says:

    Gawd, I’m glad I live in Wyoming where those types of rabid animal gangs are not tolerated. Too bad I can’t be on this guy’s jury.

    1. sheldon says:

      Not tolerated? You don’t have that kind of violence because there are like 2,000 people in your entire state and no one wants to live there. In LA/NY where there actually are people (and not crops) we have a lot of gang violence- it’s not tolerated, it’s hard to control

      1. RW Reagan says:

        In Dallas we don’t have those kind of problems because the gang-bangers know we’ve got weapons and will shoot them.

        1. tom curry says:

          Amen, tell it like it is; defend yourself and you family; the perps die…too bad!!!

      2. Alex P says:

        Not Tolerated in Los Angeles — What a JOKE — East LA is controlled by MS13 not LAPD or LA County Sheriff. I do believe there are more Gang Members in Los Angeles County than Law Enforcement officers

        1. steve says:

          noone white wants to live in LAA county.

          Most of us live in Orange CO or Ventura.

          there are no bangers around here I promise u.

          I have a concealed permit and I use it.

          I have lots of friends in law and in lawenforcement that help the folks get permits (etc.)

      3. unarmed peasant says:

        Gang violence is tolerated, that’s why it’s out of control.

        There is only one solution. This guy had the right tools for the solution, but the law protects gang bangers. So the gang maggots are still out there, and bolder because the one person who stood up to them is now in jail.

      4. Brad says:

        That’s right, it’s not tolerated. many people in densely populated areas don’t have to deal with this kind of fecal residue because we simply don’t pander to the leftists and their cry’s for tolerance.

      5. James H Macklin says:

        The State of NY and the city are proud of their Sullivan Law. The fact that it was written by a gangster leader of the F Points Irish gang so he could issue a license to carry to his gang and deny a license to the rival gangs might explain why crime in NYC is higher than in upstate NY and far higher in places like Wichita, KS, Texas, Wyoming where a citizen can get a license to carry. The law also provides that when threatened any person may use force, up to and including lethal force per KSA 21-3211,3212 and 3213. We can even own real machine guns. BTW, our crime rate is going down.
        Self-defense is a natural right, the NY, CA,MA, and MD laws make self-defense illegal for many people, maybe that is why it isn’t safe for mothers and children.

      6. LA/NY sucks says:

        Why in God’s name would anyone want to live in NY/LA? They are ratholes, full of disgusting human beings like these gang members.

        I have to live in CA courtesy of the USMC, and I would rather live anywhere else.

      7. factsaregood says:
        sort by total violent crime. NYC is ranked something like 55th in the nation with less violent crime per 100,000 people than cites like Tulsa, Kansas City, Oklahoma City, Omaha, Witchita, Anchorage. And RW Reagan, Dallas is ranked much lower than NYC from the 2008 census. Murder rate per 100,000 people: Dallas-13.3 NYC-6.3

      8. factsaregood says:
        sort by total violent crime. NYC is ranked something like 55th in the nation with less violent crime per 100,000 people than cites like Tulsa, Kansas City, Oklahoma City, Omaha, Witchita, Anchorage. And RW Reagan, Dallas is ranked much lower than NYC from the 2008 census. Murder rate per 100,000 people: Dallas-13.3 NYC-6.3

      9. Frank says:

        No. Not tolerated as in there would not be shots in the lawn , there would be shots in their heads. Nobody in Wyoming would put up with this gang banger bull for two seconds.

      10. Anton says:

        Gangs are tolerated in large cities because we have not the will to control them lest we be labeled racists or bigots. These murderous and lawless gangs need to be erased from our civilised society.

      11. Jack Kennedy says:

        then why live in places where gangs run the show and liberals enable them to take more, vandalize more and kill more

      12. David says:

        Wyoming is God’s COuntry, and everyone is armed and know how to use them.
        Dont mess with the Cowboy State!

        1. Grant says:

          Wyoming is God’s COuntry, and everyone is armed and know how to use them.
          Dont mess with the Cowboy State!

          All ten of you?

      13. joe cool says:

        if you were allowed to shoot those gang bangers on the first offense, or lock them up for 10 years on their first serious attempt, then I would agree that you do “not tolerate” them. But you arrest them for serious crimes, and let them out again, repeatedly. That is what “tolerating crime” means.

      14. John says:

        Does it hurt to be that stupid?

    2. waltc says:

      ditto and living in Wyoming and being on the jury.

    3. Gulchin says:

      Just bought vacation home in WY. If this keeps up, it will soon become my permanent residence.

      Sometimes, hunting accidents they should..

    4. Heath says:


      I hope this man gets a who bunch of folks like you on his jury, if it goes that far.

    5. Nervous says:

      Wyoming is safer because nearly all 2000 of us carry abd we love living here thank you.

    6. Al, MT says:

      Your in Wyoming? No gangs Want to go to Wy

    7. dogbreath says:

      AND we want to keep Wyoming low populated. But Ron, sorry to say, there are gangs or wanna-be gangs in Cheyenne and Casper. People bring their kids here to get them away from gangs and the kids then start their own gang here so they can be the big gang guy.

  48. Nick says:

    Cops gotta confiscate the LEGAL gun. Can’t have citizens protecting themselves. Why, if this keeps up, there won’t be any need for those lazy bone heads eating donuts in the police stations.

    1. Art House says:

      Ask OB. The home owner “acted stupidly”. It’s Bush’s fault.

    2. yah right says:

      Nick… “won’t be any need” ?? like there is now??

      of but of course there is need! don’t we just absolutely Need these cops who do nothing but brutality, murder, posturing, wrongful arrest, protection of criminals, and roadside secretarial work??

      and think of all the Jobs that would be lost! can’t have That!

      (even if you Are paying for it!)

    3. yah right says:

      great new song about this kind of stuff I think you’ll all love

  49. elian says:

    I’ve got news for these courts and the police as well, and they had vest get it loud and clear and quickly so. You can wallow in your “laws” all you want, but what you are not going to do is keep people from defending themselves even if that means shooting someone who threatens our lives. Your laws kill people every day you morons. Get it right or get out of the way. Believe it.

    1. never ending fight for freedom says:

      what he said.

      1. swanseajack says:

        Right on

    2. Mark in Durango says:


    3. mreavy says:

      In Louisiana, we would have given the guy a medal. If this guy goes to jail for defending his home, it just widens the divide between us (law abiding citizens of all races, creeds and colors) and them (the law breakers, of all races, creeds, and cultures).

      1. Bender says:

        You Right!

      2. H.S. says:

        The real divide is between the honest citizens of this country and the corrupt leftist politicians we elected. They want to tear down the Constitution and disarm law abiding citizens. THROW THE DEMOCRATS OUT IN NOVEMBER!!!!!

      3. Mark says:

        OK. As a fellow resident of Louisiana, don’t believe your own b.s.; Law abiding citizens’ rights are under attack everywhere in America. Have you forgotten the confiscation of legal weapons after Katrina? Do you think that those confiscations were from criminals?? Wake Up America!

      4. lewis128 says:

        i don’t know about a medal. He did not take any off the streets

      5. Chris says:

        In Louisiana after Katrina they confiscate law abiding citizens guns when they needed them the most. The federal government and law enforcement are now the enemy.

      6. debrarae steinman says:

        I agree with you 100%. The police should have arrested the gang, instead of arresting the home owner! They were threatening to kill him and his family, and the PIGS still arrested him? How DARE THEY! The PROPER POSITION for the NYPD is ON THEIR KNEES BEGGING THE HOME OWNER’S FORGIVENESS!

      7. wittywife says:

        Agreed. Seriously, he had the permit for the gun, and over twenty man were threatening to kill him and his family? Darn right I would have fired a warning shot.

    4. joe cool says:

      ditto that

      1. yah right says:

        too bad his friend didn’t have an AK too, to take those gangster COPS down when they ARREST THE VICTIM like they ALWAYS DO ANYMORE!

    5. mike says:

      If you have MS-13 Shadowing or following you….you have 2 choices…kill or be killed! This is for real….my best friend was hacked up with a machete by these guys….this is no joke…. If you think you are immune to this kind of stuff, wake up!!! These people have no soul……

      1. Wes S says:

        So now that this man who is trying to protect his family is disarmed, is he still living?

        To me it looks like the cops just set him and his family up for a killing by disarming him.

      2. Woofie says:

        Wes S is 100% correct.

      3. Dan Armbruster says:

        @ Wes S– They said he wasn’t breaking the law by owning the AK-47 so he can keep it. They didn’t “disarm” him. If they confiscated it for the class-D felony of reckless endangerment (which they didn’t say if they did), I bet he has more than just that AK-47….bring it MS-13, he’s waiting by the door. As should be EVERYONE living in that neighborhood. Stand together or die alone.

      4. debrarae says:

        You and WES S are completely right! And IF anything happens to that family the NYPD will NEVER wash that blood off of their FILTHY HANDS! PIGS to the CORE!

      5. Al says:

        @Armbruster a conviction for a felony will mean no guns

      6. Mark says:

        Neither do the god damned pigs that enable them.

    6. Frank says:

      Exactly. Law enforcement usually only can clean up the mess. Defending ourselves is our duty.

      1. yah right says:

        pigs don’t clean up the mess, they only ever make it worse!

    7. loubator says:

      In Chandler, Arizona last Saturday night, a man shot and killed two gang-bangers who threatened him and his wife. He has not been charged and is free. Two pieces of crap are off the streets. He, like me, has a CCW permit and a weapon. And you Easterners think us Arizonans are nuts?

      1. CCH-East says:

        loubator, please don’t forget, common sense occurs on the east coast below Maryland!

      2. Don says:

        Thought you didn’t need a permit there any more.

        BTW we do OK in PA except for Philly

      3. Sam H says:

        Texans sure don’t

      4. say no to RINO's says:

        And you Easterners think us Arizonans are nuts?


        Well you keep voting for Rino McCain

      5. Corvus Tempestas says:

        Open Carry, no permit in NH. Live Free Or Die!

      6. Guest says:

        “easterner” meaning Tennessee? No way loubator. I wish we had a law going into effect here like Arizona because it’s getting just as bad.

      7. notaboutteabagging says:

        this guy from mississippi supports you all the way

        it’s like someone you love has to be killed on your property first before anything is done, by then, it’s to late. even then, i’m sure you would get charged some how.

      8. Dan Armbruster says:

        As CCH-East said, there are others around the country that agree with you and we are ready with our own weapons of self-protection. I, like him, are Arizonans in Michigan clothing….or south of Maryland clothing.

      9. RCG says:

        I wish CCW permits were easier to get in this state. 🙁

      10. Shakeymclovin says:

        I live on LI and do not think folks from Arizona are nuts. I support state rights and oppose gun control. Come on lets not be divided now. Gun Control works just ask Hitler, Stalin, Mao Se Tung, Pol Pot. Listen to Alex Jones. USA stop the NWO.

      11. Arizona Girl says:

        I too live in the area you speak of and I also carry a CCW for the same reasons. We have to take it upon ourselves to protect those we love. Hopefully this man will be let go and the courts will not file any charges against him. The community needs to stand up and support him or the gangs have won,. I applaud his quick thinking.

      12. Matt says:

        I’m an “Easterner” in Virginia. We have the most relaxed gun laws in the country. Not all “Easterners” think you guys out west are nuts. (And I tend to to vote democratic, and I don’t favor laws that restrict gun ownership, and I own guns [plural], and I carry guns openly, and I carry guns concealed, and I get into arguments with the police about it frequently, and I continue to carry, and the commonwealth of Virginia places very few restrictions on gun ownership and carrying guns, and the commonwealth doesn’t allow any local laws restricting guns.)

    8. VirginiaGentleman says:

      Well said!

    9. Irishalaman says:

      These are the people who used to be our heroes. they used to get medals. Now our idiotic laws allow them to be arrested? Were any criminals arrested for Trespassing? This is deadly stuff.

      1. Dan says:

        The right of self defense never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals…
        James Monroe

        1. Drake says:

          The key word is “SELF” defense! Not “police” defense. Well said.

          1. Bross says:

            Guns are too easy to get in this country. period. I do think this man was in the right, this country shouldn’t of been able to get this out of control. I’ve had the pleasure of living in a country where gun control was the farthest worry from their lives. Here gang members have them, police carry them, your kids have them, your grandma has them and we are proud of this chaos? I asked a friend from said country what the basic stereotype of Americans was. He said “really dumb (almost retarded) gun toting, psychopaths.” Wow, that’s embarrassing.

    10. Dan says:

      Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion… in private self-defense.
      John Adams

      1. True American says:

        I love the fact that you know of this quote. The problem is it is constantly mis-quoted. The full quote is below.

        To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.
        —John Adams, A Defence of the Constitutions of the United States 475 (1787-1788)

        1. yah right says:

          except when the laws are unlawful!

        2. Frank says:

          “except in private self-defense”

        3. AK47 says:

          exception is private self defense
          which this was

        4. tony says:

          true American, whats that?

    11. DrM says:

      This is why we giot out of NY! Why pay taxes to a state that refuses to respect your God given rights?

      1. Rational Man says:

        God did not give you the right to have a gun or to shoot someone. But I agree in general that this chap should not be charged.

        1. Kevin says:

          Sorry. You obviously are not speaking about God, but rather attributing to God your own personal beliefs.

      2. Stonewall says:

        Actually, God DID give you the right to defend your family by any means at your disposal. You must be one of those cowardly Brits who gave up your right to self defense. Huh, chap?

      3. Karl says:

        for the irrational person using the title rational man.

        God did give the right to defend life and property, the second amendment recognizes that this goal can be accomplished with a gun. When all that stands between your family and life is a bunch of thugs you might reconsider your irrational thoughts. The police have no obligation to protect you.

        The seminal case establishing the general rule that police have no duty under federal law to protect citizens is DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services. also see Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department.

        Many states, however, have specifically precluded such claims, barring lawsuits against State or local officials for failure to protect, by enacting statutes such as California’s Government Code, Sections 821, 845, and 846 which state, in part: “Neither a public entity or a public employee [may be sued] for failure to provide adequate police protection or service, failure to prevent the commission of crimes and failure to apprehend criminals.”

      4. Brian says:

        Actually Rational Man, the Right to Arm yourself does come from God. Try reading the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. Both documents clearly state that the Rights that humans have come from our Creator, not any government. It is the government’s job to protect those rights from being infringed.

      5. Nate Tanguay says:

        To Rational Man:
        “… if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
        Jesus at Luke 22:36.

      6. Todd says:

        Rational Man,
        God gave us that right when we pushed the British out of here over 200 years ago!
        You guys still sore about that or that you let them take all yours away without a fight?

    12. Cliff says:

      Yes, what he said. These aren’t laws anyway, they are statutes applicable only to U.S. national citizens, not lawful state citizens as the founders intended. The original state Constitutions prior to Reconstruction are the true laws. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED — what is so hard to understand about that.

      Also, there was NO INJURED PARTY! No victim, no crime!

      If all of us would start ignoring these unlawful statutes and start asserting our rights together, this entire country would be a lot better off. Americasremedy . c om and NCrepublic . or g

    13. Chris says:

      Amen. The cops protect criminals and arrest people protecting themselves.

      Welcome to the death of America. We dont need terrorists to do it; we have the police.

      1. Corvus Tempestas says:

        “We dont need terrorists to do it; we have the police.”

        But there you go, repeating yourself.

      2. yah right says:

        if police are not charged with protecting us, Why Do They Get to Carry Guns??

        for Self-Defense and Harassment purposes only??

        they get to defend Themselves, but we Don’t??

        yet they fail to apprehend the perps, then use their guns to punish us for doing their work???

        why are they not all fired by now?? we can’t afford them, and they serve no purpose but to hurt us…

    14. Fed up! says:

      Agreed! The liberal legislators and activist judges are just as much an enemy as ms 13 or any of the low life scumsuckers that prey on the law abider.

    15. General Drake says:

      Listen to me:
      This is another form of “gun control” if they can control how you defend your family. And “reckless endangerment”? Really? I didn’t know it was “reckless” to protect your family from murderers by shooting grass!!! I didn’t see the police there…which is why we have guns in the first place. He handled the situation perfectly as far as I can tell. The police….BAD CALL! We always hear of stories where the Police SHOOT AND KILL an UNARMED 12 year old because it looked like he was “reaching for something that might be a gun”. Now you arrest THIS MAN?!!!

      1. yah right says:

        I just cannot understand why the citizens of the US continue to bear this oppression and brutality, and have not united in arms against the gangs who call themselves police and do nothing but hurt us at every turn on our own dime.

        I just cannot fathom. we must enjoy the torture?

    16. ta says:

      totally with you brother.

    17. Corvus Tempestas says:

      “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.
      Abraham Lincoln”

      Epic lulz.

      1. shroomduke says:

        I’m with ya as long as we, they, whoever actually support and uphold the constitution and our laws, too often people use populist indignation to start a movement that goes astray as did those that took the German people astray, when we say Justice we mean Justice for ALL, when we say Liberty we mean Liberty for all, when we say Equality we mean Equality for all!

        Today it seems that some people are far more Just, Free and Equal than the rest of us!

        Just remember, True Democracy requires three things… Oversight, Transparency and Accountability! All have been in short supply for the past 30 years!

    18. Josh says:

      Agree 100%. I will use whatever force I deem necessary to defend my home. And, the law that you can only use physical force to deter physical force is ludicrous. As if this man was supposed to take on 20 men by his own physical force. Horrible legislating going on here.

    19. Josh says:

      Agree 100%. I will use whatever force I deem necessary to defend my home. And, the law that you can only use physical force to deter physical force is ludicrous. As if this man was supposed to take on 20 men by his own physical force. Horrible legislating going on here.

    20. notaboutteabagging says:

      Looks like you need to reevaluate who the nut is. If you believe you can just “take away” the guns from the druggies and gang bangers, you are wrong.

      “White Christian nazi oppressors”, lol. I guess I really don’t have to guess who you’ll vote for in November.

      To make it simple for you, lets break down how you are exactly what you proclaim to hate.

      Your quote on what we should get rid of: “guns” “racist hatred”

      Your quotes on other people: “gun nuts” “white christian nazi oppressor pig” “under the heel of their hobnailed jackboot” “tea-bagging racist gun nut” “pigs”

      So are you saying we should get rid of YOU?

      Think about your post before you actually try making a point and totally turning on your own self.

      Your name doesn’t fit your hate speech (toward yourself, lol), and you aren’t even close to liberty for this country.

    21. Dave says:

      Surprising they didn’t label the man defending his home a “White Supremacist”.

      1. gaZ says:

        The man was black not white. A black family man with a legal gun and no criminal record. This guys a role model; the NRA should do a front page story on him.

    22. ezekiel 33:6 says:

      I carry a gun cause a cop is to heavy. When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away!

      1. yah right says:

        I’d rather carry a cop… a Dead one! and just Throw his fat piggy ass on top of anyone threatening me! what are they going to do, take away my weapon? soon, there will be plenty more where he came from…

    23. Rich says:

      Where is this guys leagle defence fund.. I dont have a lot of money but i’ll send $5.00 to help this guy out!

    24. santaYque says:

      elian gonzalez?

    25. Rusty says:

      Absolutely. Judges, lawyers, and politicians are a disgrace to American ideals.

    26. yah right says:

      so… since the courts and police are in the way of defending ourselves… apparently we need to “defend ourselves” against them first… ah but they don’t roll up on your lawn until these gangsters do! save some ammo!!!

    27. yah right says:

      everyone in that neighborhood should stand ready and all shoot that gang at once the minute they appear, regardless if they do anything. they’ve done enough already. let that “high tech” system go off all it wants… they going to arrest the whole neighborhood? the neighborhood should shoot the fkkn pigs too, they are a worse and bigger gang than the ms13.
      they’re going to get bloodshed anyway, they might as well get some benefit from it!!

    28. yah right says:


      not that Lincoln was all that great, waging war and killing so many people just to keep states from exercising their right to leave…

      1. Paul says:

        Except that states did not have a legal right to leave. The courts decided such:

        Could they leave? Sure, but it wouldn’t be legal and the government that exists under the Constitution would have a duty to take action against that illegality.

        It’s like signing a legal contract and then trying to duck out of it later. Sure, you could do it, but don’t be surprised if the government comes after you to either make you do it or you get sued in court for the damages you caused by breaking the contract.

    29. ferd says:

      Very true although under amendment 2 all has the right to protect themselfs criminals or not it was was not till later on the us government passed laws sayings criminals don’t have that right and with all the new illegal laws now days your are a felon and or criminal for a minor offense but that’s how they control guns etc also no where does it say the person in attempt must of a hacious crime has to act before you defend yourself that again is a later law more or less sayin they shoot at you and if your lucky you can defend yourself shootin back he acted corresctly defending himself and family it don’t mateer if it was one person a group or a gang he felt threaten and was acting in defense and now his rights will be stripped by illigal laws put in by an illegal government

    30. John says:

      Agreed, Elian. The Constitution and “man’s” law are two different things with two different purposes.One is to protect and the other is to control..
      It can’t be much different across the country but I had a cop stop when I was walking home one night, I was walking on the side of the road. He tells me I was trespassing and if he saw me again he would put me in jail. I have learned a few things since then, one being the cop is full of chit, I contacted the city and asked them, since there were no signs saying anything and cars pass there constantly.
      I also got the oath the officers pledge before they become officers, it is: “I do solemnly swear that I will support and bear true faith and allegiance to the constitution and laws of the United States of America and the State of Arizona; and to the charter and ordinances of the City of Phoenix, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties assigned to me as a police officer according to the best of my ability, so help me God.” I see contradiction between the constitution and “man’s” law.

    31. Secruss says:

      right on, brother

    32. darryl says:

      If you convict him of this Crime… You will have me to answer to!!!!! Bear this warning in mind…That the Righteious will Judge the Wicked… I will not tolerate an Abuse to any family that their life is Threatened….Weather you wright a Law that Prohibits a Man not to protect his Family… I will give the Highest Punishment Allowed By God so that it is not Considered Abuse….Because The Lord is not A Cruel God….That’s Why I say That God allows!!! Bear this in Mind God is NO Respector of persons means what ever your color we are All Judged by the Same Law…. What he said,,Was Totally reasonable…He asked you to leaven…That’s Reasonable… Any person that owns their home has the right to tell you to leave… I don’t care who you are…And if you are Stupid enough to stand in front of an AK -47 with it going Off…That’s you own stupid fault.!!!! If you threaten my Life that Proceed any Law that is Written!!! That is an Emergency!!! He lives their he knows where not to shoot at I’m sure…And if this man Shot someone by accident while trying to protect his Family,, The blood is on the hands of the person that violated his God given right!!! I don’t care if you are God himself!!! God can’t brake the Law that he created and that’s a fact he sent his son to die for Humanity because Gods law could not be changed… Need I say more? OK then you are playing with fire !!! To take this kinda right away from an man that was attacked by word or deed… EGW Says That I saw on the Day of Judgment that all were standing at the bar of God like the sand of the sea…Each case was showed In Living Color in the sky Imagine Fire-wokes…God has a tv screen that you cannot imagine… Each case was showed in living color…Even to the Very thought they were thinking at the time will be displayed in the heavens… You will Not escape God is not partial to anyone The hole truth will be lay ed out in living color…. The Righteous will have gown over the record books for 1,000 years and your punishment is already decided when the Lord raises the wicked to receive their punishment… So you Go ahead and punish this man for protecting his Family….I swear To God I’ll be weighting on you when your judgment day comes!!! You will have hell to pay..

    33. Marek Stuart says:

      As any body guard would tell you it’s imposible to see a gun when there is a large congregation of people unless it’s up above heads. Also, when someone is frightening you and your family the best when is to retreat; but there is a catch-22 where do you retreat when your escape route is cut like in this case. You are in your home and the house is surrunded. Anyway, why the hell a city has a military grade device called “ShotSpotter” it was first deployed in Iraq.

    34. Marek Stuart says:

      As any bodyguard would tell you it’s imposible to see a gun when there is a large congregation of people; unless the gun is up above people heads. Also, when someone is frightening your life and your family the best course of action is to retreat. However, there is a catch-22 where do you retreat when your escape route is cut like in this case. You are in your home and the house is surrunded. Anyway, why the hell a city has a military grade device called “ShotSpotter.” The device was first used in Iraq.

    35. Brian says:

      Yeah man. I second that for sure. You get a bunch of low lifes threatening your family then they should be brought down! If the law isn’t going to get the job done then what can they expect but to have citizens doing this? If you ask me the home owner showed a great deal of restraint by firing into the grass instead of shooting some of those dirt bags.

    36. Jeff says:

      I support the man in the use of any gun that will save his life and/or the lives of his family members .

    37. chris says:

      Where is the court case being held? everyone in long island/new york should go protest, this guy was just defending his family…. if the guys family is harmed while he is under arrest, the police are directly responsible for their harm and should be thrown in jail for the death penalty.
      This is getting stupid… since when is it illegal to deffend your home from invasion, what was the guy supposed to do? wait till they where raping and killing his wife and kids to take action? the gang made a clear and present threat that they intended to enter his home and do harm to his family… I would of shot them in the knees at the very thought of the word.

    38. mannye ayala says:

      i agree – thats why the say justice is blind

      the law protects the unlawful and punish the lawful. thats bull.

    39. lobo says:

      Wipe them out. Start with a clean slate. Down with Obama! Viva la revolucion!

      1. ha says:

        is lobo short for lobotomy?

    40. Willa says:

      And the person that wrote this article leads it with a line up of AK’s like the guy had an arsenal. He had ONE. Now tell me the press isn’t trying to stir up against the citizen too!!!!!

    41. focuszone says:

      That’s right, “laws” serve no purpose- we should get rid of them all. In fact, we should encourage everyone in the suburbs to carry a Kalashnakov and fire it whenever they feel threatened. Oh wait- this isn’t Kandahar. If the facts show this man had good reason to fear for his life, no jury will convict him. But verbal threats and trespassing aren’t a good enough reason to discharge a military weapon in a neighborhood.

    42. Dan says:

      VERY well said!

Leave a Reply