WASHINGTON (AP / WCBS 880 / CBS 2) – Bristling over the unauthorized release of more than a quarter million classified State Department documents, the Obama White House on Monday ordered a government-wide review of how agencies safeguard sensitive information.

WCBS 880’s Paul Murnane on the condemnation

The weekend release of documents reflecting, in some cases, unflattering assessments of world leaders has caused embarrassment to the administration. The director of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget, Jacob Lew, said in ordering the agency-wide assessment Monday that the disclosures are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk on the worldwide impact

Publication of the secret memos and documents made public by the online whistle-blower Wikileaks Sunday amplified widespread global alarm about Iran’s nuclear ambitions. It also unveiled occasional U.S. pressure tactics aimed at hot spots in Afghanistan, Pakistan and North Korea. The leaks disclosed bluntly candid impressions from both diplomats and other world leaders about America’s allies and foes.

It was, said Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini, the “Sept. 11 of world diplomacy.”

In the wake of the massive document dump by online whistleblower WikiLeaks and numerous media reports detailing their contents, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was expected to address the diplomatic repercussions later Monday. Clinton may have to confront the fallout first hand after she leaves Washington on a four-nation tour of Central Asia and the Middle East — a region that figures prominently in the leaked documents.

WCBS 880’s Pat Farnack with the New York Times’ Ian Fisher

Rep. Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, the senior Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, called the release very damaging.

CBS News’ Peter Maer on White House reaction

Michigan’s Rep. Peter Hoekstra said he believes “there’s a whole number of time bombs” in the documents made public by the online whistle-blower group Wikileaks. And the man in position to be the next chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee urged the Obama administration to declare the Wikileaks organization a terrorist operation.

“The catastrophic issue here is just a breakdown in trust,” said Hoekstra, adding that other countries – America’s allies and possibly adversaries as well – are going to ask, ‘Can the United States be trusted? Can the United States keep a secret?’ ”

Hoekstra said the disclosure of previously secret diplomatic cables, documents and e-mails secrets puts America’s diplomats in “a very awkward position.” He said some of the material in the roughly 250,000 released documents is “gossip,” but added that there’s also material on supersensitive negotiations between the United States and Pakistan on a deal aimed at controlling nuclear proliferation.

“I haven’t seen it in any of the tactical information.”

On indications in the documents that U.S. diplomats based at the United Nations were asked to gather information on the secretary general, Hoekstra said such a disclosure will make life more difficult for America’s public officials, saying it “potentially compromises their position and their relationship with the people that they work with.”

Hoekstra, who lost a bid to become Michigan’s governor earlier this month, called the incident “a massive failure within the intelligence (community) to create this kind of database with this much information in it. I think the real surprise here is that it never happened before.”

New York’s Rep. Peter King, the ranking Republican on Homeland Security, said that if the lives of some Americans are endangered by the illegal release of classified information by the Wikileaks website, then the government should “go after” the people who control WikiLeaks for violating the espionage act.”

King maintained that WikiLeaks is “engaged in terrorist activity.” He said that by releasing secret documents, the organization is “enabling terrorists to kill Americans.”

Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Connecticut) has also condemned the release, saying, “Wikileaks’ deliberate disclosure of these diplomatic cables is nothing less than an attack on the national security of the United States, as well as that of dozens of other countries. By disseminating these materials, Wikileaks is putting at risk the lives and the freedom of countless Americans and non-Americans around the world. It is an outrageous, reckless, and despicable action that will undermine the ability of our government and our partners to keep our people safe and to work together to defend our vital interests. Let there be no doubt: the individuals responsible are going to have blood on their hands.”

The encrypted e-mails and other documents unearthed new revelations about long-simmering nuclear trouble spots, detailing U.S., Israeli and Arab world fears of Iran’s growing nuclear program, American concerns about Pakistan’s atomic arsenal and U.S. discussions about a united Korean peninsula as a long-term solution to North Korean aggression.

None of the disclosures appeared particularly explosive, but their publication could become problems for the officials concerned and for any secret initiatives they had preferred to keep quiet. The massive release of material intended for diplomatic eyes only is sure to ruffle feathers in foreign capitals, a certainty that already prompted U.S. diplomats to scramble in recent days to shore up relations with key allies in advance of the leaks.

At Clinton’s first stop in Astana, Kazakhstan, she will be attending a summit of officials from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, a diplomatic grouping that includes many officials from countries cited in the leaked cables.

The documents published by The New York Times, France’s Le Monde, Britain’s Guardian newspaper, German magazine Der Spiegel and others laid out the behind-the-scenes conduct of Washington’s international relations, shrouded in public by platitudes, smiles and handshakes at photo sessions among senior officials.

The White House immediately condemned the release of the WikiLeaks documents, saying “such disclosures put at risk our diplomats, intelligence professionals and people around the world who come to the United States for assistance in promoting democracy and open government.”

U.S. officials may also have to mend fences after revelations that they gathered personal information on other diplomats. The leaks cited American memos encouraging U.S. diplomats at the United Nations to collect detailed data about the U.N. secretary general, his team and foreign diplomats — going beyond what is considered the normal run of information-gathering expected in diplomatic circles.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley played down the diplomatic spying allegations. “Our diplomats are just that, diplomats,” he said. “They collect information that shapes our policies and actions. This is what diplomats, from our country and other countries, have done for hundreds of years.”

The White House noted that “by its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information. It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

“Nevertheless, these cables could compromise private discussions with foreign governments and opposition leaders, and when the substance of private conversations is printed on the front pages of newspapers across the world, it can deeply impact not only U.S. foreign policy interests, but those of our allies and friends around the world,” the White House said.

On its website, The New York Times said “the documents serve an important public interest, illuminating the goals, successes, compromises and frustrations of American diplomacy in a way that other accounts cannot match.”

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange claimed the administration was trying to cover up alleged evidence of serious “human rights abuse and other criminal behavior” by the U.S. government. WikiLeaks posted the documents just hours after it claimed its website had been hit by a cyberattack that made the site inaccessible for much of the day.

But extracts of the more than 250,000 documents posted online by news outlets that had been given advance copies of the documents showed deep U.S. concerns about Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs along with fears about regime collapse in Pyongyang.

The Guardian said some cables showed King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia repeatedly urging the United States to attack Iran to destroy its nuclear program. The newspaper also said officials in Jordan and Bahrain have openly called for Iran’s nuclear program to be stopped by any means and that leaders of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt referred to Iran “as ‘evil,’ an ‘existential threat’ and a power that ‘is going to take us to war,”’ The Guardian said.

Those documents may prove the trickiest because even though the concerns of the Gulf Arab states are known, their leaders rarely offer such stark appraisals in public.

The Times highlighted documents that indicated the U.S. and South Korea were “gaming out an eventual collapse of North Korea” and discussing the prospects for a unified country if the isolated, communist North’s economic troubles and political transition lead it to implode.

The Times also cited diplomatic messages describing unsuccessful U.S. efforts to prod Pakistani officials to remove highly enriched uranium from a reactor out of fear that the material could be used to make an illicit atomic device. And the newspaper cited exchanges showing Yemen’s president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, telling Gen. David Petraeus that his country would pretend that American missile strikes against a local al-Qaida group had come from Yemen’s forces.

The paper also cited documents showing the U.S. used hardline tactics to win approval from countries to accept freed detainees from Guantanamo Bay. It said Slovenia was told to take a prisoner if its president wanted to meet with President Barack Obama and said the Pacific island of Kiribati was offered millions of dollars to take in a group of detainees.

It also cited a message from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing that included allegations from a Chinese contact that China’s Politburo directed a cyber intrusion into Google’s computer systems as part of a “coordinated campaign of computer sabotage carried out by government operatives, private security experts and Internet outlaws.”

Le Monde said another memo asked U.S. diplomats to collect basic contact information about U.N. officials that included Internet passwords, credit card numbers and frequent flyer numbers. They were asked to obtain fingerprints, ID photos, DNA and iris scans of people of interest to the United States, Le Monde said.

The Times said another batch of documents raised questions about Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and his relationship with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. One cable said Berlusconi ‘appears increasingly to be the mouthpiece of Putin” in Europe, the Times reported.

Der Spiegel reported that the documents portrayed German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle in unflattering terms. It said American diplomats saw Merkel as risk-averse and Westerwelle as largely powerless.

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, meanwhile, was described as erratic and in the near constant company of a Ukrainian nurse who was described in one cable as “a voluptuous blonde,” according to the Times.

The State Department’s top lawyer warned Assange late Saturday that lives and military operations would be put at risk if the cables were released. Legal adviser Harold Koh said WikiLeaks would be breaking the law if it went ahead. He also rejected a request from Assange to cooperate in removing sensitive details from the documents.

(Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press.  All Rights Reserved.)

Comments (7)
  1. Doris_G says:

    I posted a comment 3 times. Why didn’t you accept it?

    1. Michael H. says:

      I’m getting a little sick of the same thing happening to me. Get your act together CBSLocal.com!

      I posted to debunk Robert’s nonsense and after three tries it still didn’t post!

  2. Robert says:

    Wikileaks is an anti-American operation..that’s all I need to know. Does Wikileaks post any secret memos from say…Hugo Chavez???? I doubt it…because he’s not the one they want to topple.

  3. Gregg says:

    Is there any evidence that any of the info leaked on Wikileaks has caused any phisical harm to any individual ? I don’t think so – just polititions grandstanding !

    1. DanTe says:

      Stupid, aren’t you?

  4. Paul says:

    Many years ago 1010WINS had regular soundbite sources, whom they always used for comments. One was a rabbi, who gave the “Jewish Opinion” on things, another was Roy Innis of the Congress of Racial Equality, who constituted the “Black Opinion”. When Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated, WINS sent a reporter to Williamsburgh to interview Satmar Hasidim–problem was, the Satmar are non-Zionist, so he got no comments. Then the news anchor got a hold of the soundbite rabbi, who thought that the assassination was a good thing, in a live telephone interview (what was that bit about Rabbi Akiva, anyway?). They never used him, again. Roy Innis’ opinions seemed to always reflect white corporate America (the Post loved him), but WINS kept presenting him, until his whacko mayoral primary run, when he became a real embarassment. Now, the station is constantly using Peter King for soundbites on terrorism. What will happen when his former links to the Provisional Irish Republican Army become a big story? You guys really ought to hire some researchers, to check up on these folks, before you latch onto them.

  5. Jerry_Leigh says:

    Peter King has supported terrorism in the past. His active support for the Provisional I.R.A. resulted in the feds tailing him over it; his fighting to allow an illegal alien Provisional I.R.A. gunman to remain in the U.S.; and the British authorities deeming him a threat to Queen Elizabeth and former Prime Minister Thatcher (imagine if he becomes part of the U.S. delegation to the wedding!!!). He broke with the Provos, not over ideology, but because they wouldn’t support the Iraq war (after all he did for them!– a Todd Palin moment). Wikileaks should release what the British and the U.S. have on HIM!!! Pataki’s mispronounciation of “Boehner” will be on the lips of a lot more people when King becomes head of the House Homeland Security Committee.

Leave a Reply