By Sweeny Murti
» More Columns

Assuming he exercises his opt-out clause, can the Yankees afford to re-sign CC Sabathia?

The better question is this—can they afford not to?

Sabathia has been among the most durable and dominant pitchers in baseball for a decade, and consider how good he’s been the last three years in pinstripes. In 101 regular season starts Sabathia is 59-23 with a 3.18 ERA. He is the first Yankee in 60 years to win at least 19 games three years in a row and is the first Yankee since Mike Mussina to lead the Yankees in innings pitched three straight years.

Mussina is a good comparison to look at, now that Sabathia is essentially a free agent at age 31. Mussina was 32 years old when the Yankees signed him to a six-year deal, followed by a two-year deal, total value equaling about $110 million for eight years. It was good value for the Yankees, as Mussina averaged 31 starts per year from 2001-2008.

Sabathia is exactly the same thing the Yankees were looking for when they signed Mussina. They were looking for an established, innings eating, front of the rotation pitcher in his prime. They knew that the back end of the deal was something they might regret later, but that’s the price you pay when signing veterans to long-term deals.

Even better, they already know going in that this is a pitcher who likes the New York spotlight, who can handle the New York spotlight, loves being the ace of the staff, and has already anchored a World Series championship team for them.

Will the Yankees get as much out of Sabathia as they did out of Mussina? They can only hope. But its hard to find arguments not to re-sign Sabathia, who if he wanted to could simply ask for the same seven-year, $143 million dollar contract the Yankees offered Cliff Lee last winter.

Sabathia will be leaving $92 million on the table if/when he opts out of the final four years of his contract. And in a year when the next-best available free agent pitcher is C.J. Wilson and the rest of the pack includes Edwin Jackson, Joel Pineiro, Mark Buehrle, and Bruce Chen…Sabathia is probably in a position where he can ask for a very big chunk of change, and how can the Yankees say no?

Even with the likes of Manny Banuelos, Dellin Betances, Hector Noesi, David Phelps, Adam Warren and a host of young arms nearly ready for the major leagues, the Yanks can’t play this like they are the Tampa Bay Rays. They can’t throw a bunch of young pitchers out there and say, “Watch these guys, they’re pretty good now, but will be really good in a couple years.” The Yankees need to maintain their position as 95-100 win pennant contenders.

And the best way to do that is give Sabathia the money.

There is some concern about a long-term deal with Sabathia, as there are with any pitchers. Many speculated that Sabathia’s weight was a factor down the stretch this season, but he has actually been effective at even heavier weights earlier in his career. Will it be an issue in years to come? Maybe, but you can’t say for certain. Sabathia has been very large—and very good—his entire major league career. Sabathia’s work ethic and desire will keep him in top pitching shape. If anything, the six-man rotation in the second half seemed to bother Sabathia more than any weight issues.

There is risk signing any pitcher to a long-term contract, and it’s unfortunate for the Yankees that they have basically lost a top pitcher under contract for four more years and likely have to replace him by signing a guy for six or seven more years, the same guy in fact. But the Yankees will be dealing with several known factors this time as opposed to unknown factors of a guy coming from another team.

Let’s put it to you another way. If CC Sabathia was opting out after spending the last three years in Milwaukee and was going to be the top free agent pitcher on the market this year, is there anything you wouldn’t do to have him in Yankee pinstripes next year?

That’s what I thought.

Sweeny Murti

Can the Yankees afford to lose CC? How much cash and how many years should they throw at him? Let Sweeny know in the comments below…

Comments (5)
  1. iggy says:

    i say if he opts out, let him go. the yankees can lose in the first round without him. nova won almost as many games and he lost 6 weeks after being sent down.

  2. Brandon says:

    I’m in the ad business (not in NEW YORK) and rumor is YES is not getting the ad renewals and rates they are wanting. Also if you watch a game seems like a lot of empty expensive seats. Add it up and less revenue means less you can spend on players.

  3. Mike says:

    There is no way the Yankees cannot afford to sign CC. Comparing him to A-Rod?? Maybe in terms of money and length of contract, but I know I have zero problem handing this guy the ball in a big spot, despite his less-than-stellar start and relief appearance against Detroit. We can’t say that about A-Rod in a similar situation, can we? And as to being able to afford to let him go – who will be our #1 starter on an already thin staff? Nobody currently in a Yankee uniform, or available on the free agent market. So not only would we not make the World Series, there’s a solid chance we won’t even make the playoffs or be competitive. Don’t think so? Anyone else here remember the 80’s, ie. big bats, no arms? He’ll get Cliff Lee $$ and years and the Yankees (and I) will be glad to pay it.

  4. Gary Sartori says:

    People are already comparing CC to A-Rod because of the money and the years the Yankees are most likely to give him. I would love to have Sabathia on the Yanks for the foreseeable future, but i don’t know if I’m ready to offer him 6 years, or $200 million dollars. Worse yet, i don’t want him opting out and going to Boston because the Red Sox can match anything the Yankees throw at CC. The Yanks are in a real spot here. If I had my way, I would try to limit the length of the contract to 4 years at maybe $20 million a year. Anything beyond that would be pushing it.

  5. Mook says:

    Can’t afford to let him go? Of course they can. Or else what? We don’t make the WS next year but avoid being saddled with another A-Rod contract that becomes more and more onerous as each year passes? Let’s not forget that Cashman was NOT in favor of the second A-Rod deal. It was a Steinbrenner special, just like the Soriano signing. How have they both worked out? I actually like A-Rod, but can anyone honestly say he is not on the downside of his career? How about we let Cashman make the call? I love C.C. but no well is bottomless. Not even the Yankees.

Leave a Reply