NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — Did you notice that big black box on Google’s homepage on Wednesday?

And what happened to Wikipedia?

They were part of an online protest that spilled into the streets of Manhattan, reports CBS 2’s Tony Aiello.

There was a hearty lunchtime cry from a crowd out to stop “SOPA” and “PIPA.”

LISTEN: 1010 WINS’ Al Jones reports

If you don’t know what they mean, you’re not alone. Aiello met many folks on Wednesday that had no idea, short of seeming to understand they have something to do with the Internet. For the record, SOPA stands for “Stop Online Piracy Act” and PIPA the “Protect Intellectual Property Act.”

Wikipedia went dark and Google blacked out its logo to protest the legislation – two bills proposed to combat online piracy on sites like where you can illegally download copyrighted television shows, music and movies.

But critics say SOPA — in the U.S. House — and PIPA in the Senate give the government too much power to police the Internet.

“We respect the rights of content holders. We don’t respect pirates. But we also are opposed to the possibility of Internet censorship,” Internet entrepreneur Howard Greenstein said.

“This is a dangerous censorship, a dangerous legal framework for ‘net censorship,” added David Moore of

Supporters say the “censorship” claim is bogus and nothing in the bill targets legitimate websites.

WCBS 880’s Peter Haskell With Reddit’s Chief Outside Sen. Gillibrand’s Office

Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand signed up as co-sponsors of the bill last May, but as protests have grown, culminating in this one Aiello attended Wednesday, they’re giving signs of re-thinking their support, saying in a joint statement:

“There are two important issues in this debate: continued freedom of expression on the Internet and the ability to block online piracy. We believe that both sides can come together on a solution that satisfies their respective concerns.

“We’ve had many discussions and held many meetings with all parts of the Internet community – from users, to members of the NY Tech Meet-up, to start-ups, to big Internet firms like Google, Facebook, and Yahoo – to hear their concerns regarding this proposed legislation, and we’ll continue those discussions.

“After constructive dialogue with many in the technology community, we have worked to make an important change in the bill regarding DNS provisions. We will continue to work with our colleagues to ensure a proper balance between stopping the theft of intellectual property and copyright infringement, and doing so without the unintended consequence of stifling or censoring the internet, which we strongly oppose. We have worked to make sure there are due process protections to ensure that legal activity over the Internet is not disrupted and that the web continues to be a place of innovation, intellectual freedom, and an unrestricted platform for the free exchange of ideas — and we welcome additional suggestions. While the threat to tens of thousands of New York jobs due to online piracy is real and must be addressed, it must be done in a way that allows the Internet and our tech companies to continue to flourish.”

Protestors think their voices are being heard.

Support for the bills is slipping in Congress and at the White House. It looks like the bills will be rewritten, or even scrapped.

What do you think of the proposed legislation? Sound off in our comments section below…

Comments (11)
  1. Blasterific says:

    Police State. Police State. Police State

  2. Michael H. says:

    It seriously depresses me that this story has only 8 comments and an article about tolls on the NJ TPK has double. This article has fewer comments than an article about a photoshopped picture of Beyonce. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE!?

    1. USA USSR says:

      Many of us are all ready getting used to socialism, where have you been? what do you think the dodd frank bill is,? have you heard of it, where have you internet geeks been the last 5 years while the rest of us have been getting shafted? welcome to club socialism, get used to it. Maybe you were one of the pro ows jerkoffs.

  3. Christian Matts says:

    This article totally missed the problem of the bill — not limiting distribution of stolen media — but the bill creates a vehicle to shut down websites that removes due process.

    1. Michael H. says:

      Of course the article missed the major problems with the bill. CBS is a content provider and major media company that directly supports the bill.

  4. Oh says:

    You all do know that censorship does not in ihhibit freedom of speech. Oh, you all do know what freedom of speech is. Oh, you all do know what the five freedoms are. Oh, you all have read the first ammenment. Oh, ….. what the heck ….. you all do know, don’y you ?????

  5. Katie_m_A says:

    Wikipedia is up and running, as of 1 minute ago.

    1. Jerry says:

      9:20 A.M. dark ………

    2. Stop Sensorship says:

      You may be lucky enough to have it cached. It was fine for the first few pages or two but then I got the black screen.

  6. jerseyjoey says:

    Go to google homepage and sign the pitition or be censured online Like CBS does with these posts, its that simple.

    1. Michael H. says:

      joey, for once, i completely agree with you. if you and i can agree that a bill is bad, it must be absolutely terrible.

Leave a Reply to Oh Cancel reply