Tri-State Residents, Politicians Weigh In On Possible Social Security, Medicare Changes As Part Of Debt Talks

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — The President and members of Congress are considering changes to Social Security and Medicare as part of a debt reduction plan.

Many think it’s the third rail of politics — changing health and retirement benefits for millions of Americans. But it is one of the things on the table as Democrats and Republicans in Congress wrangle over the deficit.

Congressman Peter King said that nothing should be done to affect people already collecting benefits or those who will enter the program over the next decade. However, he said the programs were unsustainable for the long term and must be fixed.

“Quite frankly, I believe that just about everything should be on the table,” King told CBS 2’s Marcia Kramer.

King said his position was a result of the thousands of new people going on Medicare every day.

“The average person on Medicare receives twice as much in benefits as they paid in premiums, so over the long term that’s non-sustainable,” King said.

Michael Olender, Associate Director of The American Association of Retired Persons, said the group is “flatly opposed to discussing cuts to Medicare and Social Security as a means of reaching some deal on deficit reduction.”

“These programs have not contributed to the deficit one penny and as such they should not be cut one penny,” Olender said.

AARP has vowed to fight any move in Washington that cuts benefits, but there are definitely mixed feelings in the area.

“It’s not as good idea. I think we have to reverse some of the George Bush policies first and then possibly look at other things, but tax breaks for millionaires and other subsidies for the wealthy just don’t make it,” Michael Avramides, a Turtle Bay resident, said.

However, Jerry Browne, a Croton-On-Hudson resident, said it doesn’t bother him.

“I just find it’s eating out of our pockets left and right the Obamacare, all of that, I’m not a big fan of it. I think everybody has to start taking responsibility for themselves,” Browne said.

President Obama said his deficit reduction meeting with lawmakers was “very constructive.”

Sources told CBS 2 that House Republican leader John Boehner told his members there could be a deal in a matter of days. Any deal is expected to close tax loopholes and have other revenue measures.

SOUND-OFF: Share Your Thoughts On This Story In The Comments Section…

More from Marcia Kramer
  • kilyaily1

    What you are single? The other half of what you are looking for? To cross-border love it? Come here–interracialsearching.сòΜ– your choice. We have different ethnic groups, solve your personal PROMBLEMS.

  • d rash

    To Howie Sprague: You are VERY MISINFORMED! I assure you the middle class IS NOT carrying ANY burden for the rich. Here are some facts from the IRS for the year 2010. THE TOP 1% OF EARNERS, PAYS A TOTAL OF 38.02% OF ALL FEDERAL TAXES. THE TOP 5% OF EARNERS PAY 57.72% OF ALL FEDERAL TAXES, AND THE TOP 25% OF EARNERS PAY 86.34% OF ALL FEDERAL TAXES. IT’S VERY PLAIN TO SEE THAT THE MIDDLE CLASS ARE DEFINITELY NOT CARRY SQUAT, FOR THE RICH. aND, YOU WANT US TO PAY MORE???????????? GET REAL!!!

  • Howie Sprague

    Before anything more is done to take away from the middle class, the elderly and the disabled; every single tax loophole for the rich must be ended. The wealthiest Americans (including many members of congress) conduct business in the Caribbean in many cases to avoid paying a large portion of their taxes. Wealthy corporations are given billions of our tax dollars in the form of subsidies and tax breaks. It’s time the government tap those who have deep pockets; the middle class can no longer carry the burden for the rich.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Giving Tuesday
Charles Osgood Event

Listen Live