NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) – Mayor Michael Bloomberg didn’t try to hide that he was financing a poll-monitoring operation during his 2009 re-election campaign, a former top aide testified Tuesday at the trial of a political operative charged with bilking the mayor out of more than $1 million.
WCBS 880’s Irene Cornell: The Defense Says There Was No Crime
Bloomberg paid for the “ballot security” initiative indirectly, through a $1.2 million personal donation to the state Independence Party. The party then hired veteran Republican consultant John Haggerty, who had outlined an extensive ballot security plan for Bloomberg campaign leaders. Prosecutors say the operation never materialized, and Haggerty used most of the money instead to buy a house.
Haggerty denies the allegations, and his lawyers are striving to raise questions about Bloomberg’s campaign finances – questions they posed Tuesday to former Deputy Mayor Kevin Sheekey.
Haggerty’s attorneys say Bloomberg’s campaign wanted to distance itself from ballot security because some see the practice as a way to suppress votes, often from minority voters. Others say it is merely about keeping an eye on the polls and any voter-eligibility problems or other difficulties that may arise.
“Your ultimate goal was to get ballot security without having the campaign’s fingerprints on it, isn’t that so?” Haggerty lawyer Dennis Vacco asked Sheekey.
Sheekey said the donation appeared on the Independence Party’s finance reports, which came out after the election, and that it quickly became public that the money was for ballot security.
“I don’t think that rises to your ‘no fingerprints”’ concept, Sheekey said.
1010 WINS’ Juliet Papa with the latest developments
He also rebuffed defense suggestions that the arrangement disguised a campaign expense as a political gift, saying it was indeed a donation that was meant to do more than help the mayor.
“The mayor made a personal contribution to the state party for the party to undertake activities on Election Day that would benefit that candidate (himself) and all candidates,” Sheekey said.
Vacco noted that Bloomberg previously had encountered criticism regarding ballot security. His 2005 Democratic opponent, former Bronx Borough President Fernando Ferrer, complained publicly that the practice was a tool for suppressing votes.
Sheekey called the complaint “hogwash.”
“A lot of Democrats often try to inject race into a campaign,” he said. “It’s not uncommon for candidates, more often Democratic candidates than Republicans in New York, to allege that ballot security is something that it’s not,” he added.
First Deputy Mayor Patricia Harris, another longtime member of Bloomberg’s circle, also took the stand Tuesday.
She testified that she had the permission to authorize use of the mayor’s personal funds and had required that Haggerty give her a detailed breakdown of his budget and plans for ballot security – including his plan to hire more than 1,300 poll watchers – before she approved the donation.
Harris explained Haggerty had done similar work for Bloomberg’s previous campaign and had no reason to think the money would be going towards anything else.
The defense has argued that prosecutors can’t prove that the money was stolen from Bloomberg because the mayor’s donation to the party could not legally be earmarked for a specific purpose.
On Tuesday, a defense lawyer asked Harris what Haggerty did in Bloomberg’s 2009 campaign.
“I know what he didn’t do,” she answered.
Bloomberg is also expected to take the stand.
(TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)