Roger Clemens, Hall Of Famer? Debate Begins Anew After Acquittal
NEW YORK (WFAN/AP) — Acquitted in court, former Yankees star Roger Clemens must wait a half-year before finding out whether he cleared his name in the minds of Hall of Fame voters.
Standards for conviction are clear in court, less so in baseball, where Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmeiro have been bypassed for the Hall thus far despite distinguished careers.
“Will I vote for him? If I had to decide right now, today, I wouldn’t,” Mike Vaccaro said in Tuesday’s edition of the New York Post. “I think he used. I think he cheated the game. And at bare minimum, I think it should cost him a first-ballot ticket.
“Will I feel differently in December? Possibly. In 2016? Maybe. In 2022? Ask me then.”
Clemens was acquitted Monday in federal court in Washington, D.C., on six counts that he lied and obstructed Congress when he denied using performance-enhancing drugs.
“I think everybody believes he was guilty in some form or fashion,” said John Harper of the New York Daily News, who doesn’t plan to vote for Clemens. “I think that’s the real issue as far as voters go. I know that’s an issue for me.”
Rusty Hardin, Clemens’ defense attorney, said his client never fixated on whether or not he would gain admission to the Hall.
“You know, the Hall of Fame thing, that’s always been other people’s concern,” Hardin said Tuesday morning during an appearance on CNN. “Roger has made clear that wouldn’t have driven him. He wanted to be considered the greatest pitcher in the history of baseball. …
“If he’s judged in history by people in baseball to have been a great pitcher, that’s good enough for him. If the writers decide to put him in the Hall of Fame, that’s fine. If they don’t, that’s their call. This guy is one of the best people who happen to be also a great pitcher that I’ve ever known.”
Clemens, Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa all will be first-timers on the ballot, which in some ways will be a referendum on the Steroids Era. Mike Piazza, Curt Schilling and Craig Biggio also will be making their initial appearances.
“I haven’t made any final decision on my votes, but my opinion has always leaned toward the idea that it is unfair to make Hall of Fame voters the steroids police,” The Seattle Times’ Larry Stone said. “We’ll never know definitively who used and who didn’t use, and MLB has never disallowed any statistics, so my inclination is to make judgments based on their performances on the field.”
Asked about Clemens’ chances for making the Hall, NBC’s Bob Costas said: “A guilty verdict would have damaged his reputation. It remains to be seen how much or if this verdict helps it.”
Costas doesn’t cast a ballot; Hall of Fame voters are veteran members of the Baseball Writers’ Association of America.
“I think some people will assume that he may very well have lied, but that the government couldn’t prove it,” former commissioner Fay Vincent said. “They may have real reservations about his record in light of those questions. But I think it modestly improves his chances of being elected to the Hall of Fame.”
Clemens spent 4½ years proclaiming his innocence after Brian McNamee, his former personal trainer, told baseball investigator George Mitchell that he injected the pitcher with steroids and human growth hormone about 16 to 21 times during 1998, 2000 and 2001.
On Monday, a jury of eight women and four men agreed with Clemens, a seven-time Cy Young Award winner.
“I think it’s great for the game because we can stop talking about it now,” Yankees captain Derek Jeter said. “I’m pretty sure baseball fans are happy it’s over.”
Yankees pitcher Andy Pettitte, a longtime friend of Clemens and a key witness in the case, wouldn’t give his opinion on the verdict, saying only: “I don’t even care to talk about that.” Pettitte was believed to have given Clemens a boost when he testified there was a 50-50 chance he might have misunderstood a conversation during the 1999-2000 offseason that the government claimed was proof Clemens admitted using HGH.
“We get all these trials out of the way, we can move on,” said Yankees manager Joe Girardi, a former Clemens teammate. “Now, it seems like we’re beyond it.”
Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig declined to comment on the verdict. Union head Michael Weiner said Clemens was “vindicated.”
“We look forward to him taking his rightful place in the Hall of Fame,” Weiner said.
Vincent called it a “big win” for Clemens and his lawyer. “It’s a major defeat for the Justice Department — one of a series,” he said. “I think the government is at a huge disadvantage against really good outside lawyers.”
Clemens is the latest sports figure to frustrate the federal government’s efforts to nab suspected steroid cheats despite prosecution costs of tens of millions of dollars.
Bonds, a seven-time NL MVP, was convicted of a single obstruction of justice count that he gave an evasive answer to a grand jury in 2003, and charges were dropped last year that he made false statements when he denied using performance-enhancing drugs.
A grand jury investigation of Lance Armstrong was dropped last winter without charges being filed, though the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency filed formal accusations last week that could strip the seven-time Tour de France winner of his victories in cycling’s premier race. Armstrong denies any doping.
Federal agent Jeff Novitzky and his teams of investigators have obtained only two guilty pleas from athletes (Olympic track star Marion Jones and former NFL defensive lineman Dana Stubblefield); and two convictions (Bonds and sprint cyclist Tammy Thomas). Jones, who also pleaded guilty to making false statements about her association with a check-fraud scheme, was the only targeted athlete to serve a day in prison.
Bonds’ conviction still must survive an appeal.
Clemens has no such worries. With a 354-184 record, 3.12 ERA and 4,672 strikeouts, he would have been a sure first-ballot Hall of Famer when the votes are totaled in January. But since the day the Mitchell Report was released, his reputation has been tainted by suspicion.
Still, Cleveland Indians pitcher Josh Tomlin was thrilled for Clemens, one of his boyhood heroes growing up in Texas.
“If a case goes on that long and the jury decides he’s not guilty, then obviously he’s telling the truth,” he said.
If you had a vote, would you cast it for Clemens? Sound off in the comments below…
(TM and Copyright 2012 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)