CBS2-Header-Logo WFAN 1010WINS WCBS tiny WLNYLogo

News

Fear Of Frogs Leads To $1.6 Million Jury Verdict For Upstate Man

(credit: Carl Court/AFP/Getty Images)

(credit: Carl Court/AFP/Getty Images)

TRI-STATE NEWS HEADLINES

From our newsroom to your inbox weekday mornings at 9AM.
Sign Up

CLARENCE, N.Y. (CBSNewYork/AP) — An upstate New York man won a $1.6 million jury verdict, after suing over a development near his home that left his property full of frogs – which he is afraid of.

Paul Marinaccio Sr. launched a seven-year legal fight against the Town of Clarence and a developer, which ended when a jury verdict awarded him the compensatory damages in a 2009 trial. But the New York State Court of Appeals ruled that Marinaccio is not entitled to an additional $250,000 in punitive damages.

Marinaccio has been afraid of frogs ever since he was a boy in Italy, when a man holding bullfrogs chased him away after he’d wandered from the vineyard where his parents worked.

Decades later, he found himself describing his phobia to the jury, calling himself “a prisoner in my own home” after runoff water from a nearby development turned his 40-acre property into wetlands and inundated it with frogs.

“I am petrified. I go home at night and I can’t get in my garage because of the frogs,” Marinaccio testified in 2009. “They’re right in front of the damn door, OK?”

Marinaccio sued Clarence, a Buffalo suburb, and Kieffer Enterprises Inc. after runoff diverted onto Marinaccio’s property from a new Kieffer subdivision turned it into wetlands. A town engineer initially said the water would flow into a ditch elsewhere on Kieffer property. The town later discovered the ditch was actually on Marinaccio’s property, and that it was too small to handle the flow of water.

Lawyers on both sides said Monday that Marinaccio’s frog testimony amounted to just moments of a more than three-week trial — and may not have affected the jury’s award. The Court of Appeals, however, referred to it in a five-page decision in which it determined that while Marinaccio had been wronged, the developer hadn’t acted maliciously.

“This newly created wetland caused mosquitoes to breed and frogs to gather on plaintiff’s property, about which plaintiff is particularly phobic,” the court wrote in an opinion dated March 21. “Consequently, plaintiff had problems traversing his property without the assistance of his family and friends, whom plaintiff would often call on to remove frogs from his driveway and near the door of his home.”

“I’m petrified of the little creatures,” Marinaccio, 65, said in Monday’s Buffalo News.

The lower court jury returned a verdict of $1.3 million against the town and $328,400 against Kieffer for compensatory damages, as well as $250,000 in punitive damages against Kieffer.

In reversing the punitive damages, the Court of Appeals said they are awarded only when there is evidence “of spite or malice, or a fraudulent or evil motive on the part of the defendant, or such a conscious and deliberate disregard of the interests of others that the conduct may be called willful or wanton.”

As part of a post-verdict agreement, the town will dig ditches to help dry out Marinaccio’s land.

The property owner told the newspaper his plans involve much bigger creatures than frogs.

“I’m going to put cows out there,” Marinaccio said.

Do you think this verdict was fair? Leave your comments below…

(TM and © Copyright 2013 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2013 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)