YONKERS, N.Y. (CBSNewYork/AP) — The revelation that a Metro-North train derailed while barreling into a sharp curve at nearly three times the speed limit is fueling questions about whether automated crash-avoidance technology could have prevented the carnage.
Safety officials have championed what’s known as positive train control technology for decades, but the railroad industry has sought to postpone having to install it because of the high cost and technological issues.
PHOTOS: Metro-North Train Derailment
As CBS 2’s Jessica Schneider reported Tuesday night, former Federal Railroad Administration investigator James Sottile was outraged about what he called a major oversight by Metro-North in not having implemented positive train control.
“These people did not have to die,” Sottile said.
He said speed control systems in place on the trains could have been activated years ago.
“Tomorrow is too late,” he said. “Install it.”
Investigators haven’t yet determined whether the weekend wreck, which killed four people and injured more than 60 others, was the result of human error or mechanical trouble. But many other safety experts have also said the tragedy might not have happened if Metro-North had the technology, and a senator said the derailment underscored the need for it.
“This incident, if anything, heightens the importance of additional safety measures, like that one,” said U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., which also is served by Metro-North. “I’d be very loath to be more flexible or grant more time.”[cbs-audio url=”http://cbsnewyork.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/marla-train-tech.mp3″ size=”340px” download=”false” name=”Metro-North Train Derailment Raises Questions About Technology” artist=”WCBS 880’s Marla Diamond Reports”]
Earl Weener, a board member with the National Transportation Safety Board, said Tuesday afternoon that while human error cannot be “eradicated,” positive train control may well have prevented the accident.
“Since this is a derailment involving a high-speed train, it’s possible that PTC could’ve prevented it,” he said.
The NTSB has been recommending the implementation of positive train control technology for 20 years, Weener said at a news conference.
“It’s absolutely critical,” said Ross Capon, president of the National Association of Railroad Passengers.
“Why wasn’t PTC (Positive Train Control, a safeguard against excessive speed) installed in this locomotive? Would it have prevented this accident?” attorney Michael S. Lamonsoff said in a release announcing the suit on behalf of his client, Dr. Denise Williams, who was injured in the derailment.
The train was going 82 mph as it entered a 30 mph turn Sunday morning and ran off the track near the Spuyten Duyvil station, Weener said Monday. He cited information extracted from the train’s two data recorders; investigators also began interviewing the train’s crew.
“At this point in time, we can’t tell” whether the answer is faulty brakes or a human mistake, Weener said. But the focus has been on human error, amid revelations by a union official that engineer William Rockefeller “nodded” or “zoned out” shortly before the accident.[cbs-audio url=”http://cbsnewyork.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/adams-derail.mp3″ size=”340px” download=”false” name=”Metro-North Train Derailment Raises Questions About Technology” artist=”WCBS 880’s Sean Adams Reports”]
The speed stunned officials.
“I gulped. It sort of takes your breath away,” said U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. “For a train to be going 82 mph around that curve is just a frightening thought.”
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said the NTSB findings make it clear “extreme speed was a central cause” of the derailment and vowed to “make sure any responsible parties are held accountable” after investigators determine why the train was going so fast.
Weener sketched a scenario suggesting that the throttle was let up and the brakes were fully applied way too late to stave off the crash.
He said the throttle went to idle six seconds before the derailed train came to a complete stop “very late in the game” for a train going that fast and the brakes were fully engaged five seconds before the train stopped.
It takes about a quarter-mile to a half-mile to stop a train going 82 mph, according to Kevin Thompson, a Federal Railroad Administration spokesman.
Weener said Tuesday that the agency had examined data from each station stop around the route, and there were no anomalies in brake performance. He said other data, such as surveillance videos, were still being examined.
Weener would not disclose what investigators know about the engineer’s version of events. He did say all of the breath alcohol tests conducted on the engineer and crew came back negative, while other substance tests were still pending.
Investigators are also examining the engineer’s cellphone; engineers are allowed to carry cellphones but prohibited from using them during a train’s run.
Positive train control is designed to forestall the human errors that cause about 40 percent of train accidents, and uses GPS, wireless radio and computers to monitor trains and stop them from colliding, derailing or going the wrong way.
The system works by using antennas and train signals to monitor the train’s location and speed.
If a train is on course to collide with another train or going too fast on a curve, PTC will warn the engineer. If they fail to react, the system will react automatically.
The transportation safety board has urged railroads to install PTC in some form since 1970, and after a 2005 head-on collision killed 25 people near Los Angeles, Congress in 2008 ordered rail lines to adopt the technology by December 2015.
Automatic braking systems have been installed on rails throughout the northeast, including on parts of the Long Island Rail Road and on all of the NJ TRANSIT lines.
New York City subways have a different safety system.
But at a cost nationwide of $10 billion, most transit systems aren’t on track to meet the federal deadline.
“The government spends huge amounts of money on highway and aviation and tends to neglect the railroads,” said Capon.
Metro-North has taken steps toward acquiring PTC but, like many rail lines, has advocated for a few more years to implement a costly system that railroads say presents technological and other hurdles.
The MTA released a statement on PTC on Tuesday evening:
“The MTA began work to install Positive Train Control on the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad in 2009. To date, the MTA has budgeted nearly $600 million for elements of PTC installation, including a $428 million procurement last month for a system integrator. Full implementation is estimated to cost $900 million, and the MTA will make sure the appropriate funding is made to implement PTC on the most aggressive schedule possible.
“However, implementing PTC by the 2015 deadline will be very difficult for the MTA as well as for other commuter railroads, as the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have both concluded. Much of the technology is still under development and is untested and unproven for commuter railroads the size and complexity of Metro-North and LIRR, and all of the radio spectrum necessary to operate PTC has not been made available. The MTA will continue its efforts to install PTC as quickly as possible, and will continue to make all prudent and necessary investments to keep its network safe.”
The MTA has advocated for an extension to 2018, saying it’s difficult to install such a system across more than 1,000 rail cars and 1,200 miles of track.
“It’s not a simple, off-the-shelf solution,” Anders said Monday.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said he’s committed to finding extra funding to implement the system.
“We will get it done. Yes, one way or another we’ll get it done,” he said Tuesday.
Los Angeles commuter rail director Richard Katz said time is of the essence.
“We believe that every year you delay positive train control, people will die that don’t have to,” he said.
Grady Cothen, a former FRA safety official, said a PTC system would have prevented Sunday’s crash if the brakes were working normally. And Steve Ditmeyer, a former FRA official who teaches at Michigan State University, said the technology would have monitored the brakes and would not have allowed the train to exceed the speed limit.
“A properly installed PTC system would have prevented this train from crashing,” he said. “If the engineer would not have taken control of slowing the train down, the PTC system would have.”
The train that derailed Sunday was configured with its locomotive in the back instead of the front. Weener said that is common, and a train’s brakes work the same way no matter where the locomotive is located. Ditmeyer said the locomotive’s location has virtually no effect on train safety.
Still, some people feel the configuration provides less protection for passengers because if the train hits something, there’s no locomotive in front to absorb the blow, said Bill Henderson, executive director of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA, a riders’ advocacy group.
Cuomo said Tuesday that since the crash, the state has been “taking new precautions to protect the safety of New York commuters.”
“At my direction, the MTA will be implementing a safety stand-down that will require all employees to participate in safety briefings,” he said in a statement.
Sunday’s accident came six months after an eastbound train derailed in Bridgeport, Conn., and was struck by a westbound train. The crash injured 73 passengers, two engineers and a conductor.
In July, a freight train full of garbage derailed on the same Metro-North line near the site of Sunday’s wreckage.
Check Out These Other Stories From CBSNewYork.com:
- 5/22 CBS2 Tuesday Morning Weather Headlines
- World War 2 Veteran On Cross-Country Tour Makes Stop In Central Park
- Dangerous Side Effects Reported From Popular Fitness Trackers
- NYPD Issues K2 Alert After Recent Spate Of Overdoses
(TM and © Copyright 2013 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2013 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)