02Logo WFAN 1010WINS WCBS tiny WLNYLogo
Holiday Weekend: Traffic & Transit | Travel Guide Forecast | Monuments | Listen Live: 1010 WINS | WCBS 880

News

NYC DOT Installs Controversial Bike Lanes On High-Traffic First And Second Avenues In Manhattan

View Comments
Manhattan Bike Lane (Credit: CBS 2)

Manhattan Bike Lane (Credit: CBS 2)

kramer

Reporting Marcia Kramer

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — There’s more bike bedlam in New York City, now that the Department of Transportation has installed new bike lanes in heavy traffic areas.

Residents said they’re wondering what officials were thinking when they installed the lanes on First and Second Avenues from 34th to 59th streets.

It’s an area already so congested at rush hour that cars can barely move, reports CBS 2’s Marcia Kramer.

“I don’t think it’s going to work,” Bruce Silberblatt said.

Silberblatt’s group, the Turtle Bay Association, took pictures showing how the First Avenue approach to the 59th Street Bridge was already congested.

“It was bedlam,” Silberblatt said. “Anybody trying to ride a bike is taking their life in their hands. It’s that dangerous.”

CBS 2 scoped out the area and spotted other potential dangers. Buses come down 48th Street and travel one block to 49th to turn around. They have to cross the new bike lane twice within one block.

A Second Avenue bike lane is next to the Israeli consulate, leaving many wondering what would happen if a man on a bike were a terrorist.

There’s an even bigger problem on the stretch of First Avenue between 48th and 49th streets. The DOT’s own flyer said that there’s supposed to be a protected bike lane, with an additional lane where cars are supposed to be able to park.

However, for traffic coming from 48th Street and from First Avenue, there’s no place for cars to go.

When asked about the potential problems with that plan, the DOT backed off the idea.

“That’s a narrower section, and it’s going to be tweaked to fit in that section,” said Joshua Benson, director of bicycle and pedestrian programs for the DOT. “It’s not going to look exactly the same as the other portions.”

In the end, it may simply be about who the streets are for, what percentage of people who use the streets are bicyclists, and what percentage are driving automobiles.

“It’s a tough number to pinpoint, but where we’ve already installed the new bike path, we see somewhere around 10 percent of the traffic is bike traffic,” Benson said.

Opponents might argue that the 90 percent who use cars and buses should rule the road, especially in an area with such high levels of congestion.

Bike advocates said they’d like to see the bike lanes on First and Second Avenues extend all the way to 125th Street.

Please offer your thoughts in the comments section below.

View Comments
  • Ted Lemon

    Man, this is a weird article. Terrorists on bicycles? Congestion on the way to the 59th street bridge? Well duh! Nobody goes that way during rush hour because of the congestion. The congestion is caused by the bridge; if you want it to go away, you need to add lanes on the bridge. Traffic is going to be stopped there whether there’s a bike lane or not.

    I’ve got to agree with the person who said that this traffic is all out-of-towners. I live in Vermont, and I drive to New York when I visit because the train service is too slow and expensive. New Yorkers who ride their bikes to and from work shouldn’t have to suffer if I’m too dumb to stay off First Avenue with my car during rush hour.

    • Ted Lemon

      Right, that’s exactly my point. There’s no way to solve this problem without adding capacity in a place where no capacity can be added. So there’s no downside to putting bike lanes in on First and Second avenues.

      The source of the congestion is the limited capacity of the 59th Street bridge and the midtown tunnel. You could add four more lanes for cars on 1st avenue (if there were room, which of course there isn’t) and you’d still be stuck waiting in traffic for the same amount of time, because 1st Avenue’s capacity is not the problem.

      If adding bicycle lane capacity emboldens some citizens to get out of their cars and ride their bikes, that might actually *reduce* the delay for you in your car. So if you want to see less congestion, you should be cheering this initiative. The point of bike lanes isn’t to punish people who drive—it’s to make better use of limited resources.

    • Tom Terrific

      Marcia Kramer IS an out of towner. She is not a New Yorker. She should be fired. She is the worst reporter in the history of NYC.

  • Chris O’Leary

    I was going to ask Marcia Kramer if she had any shame, but I think this lousy piece of sham journalism answered that question for me.

  • M to the I

    LOL! I love this article! I actually can’t stop laughing. Better than anything the Onion could have come up.

  • NYC driver

    I’m a NYC driver and this is insane. Why shouldn’t bikes have space too?. Better to keep them away from cars rather than having to weave in and out of traffic. You really think someone on a bike is more likely to be a terrorist? You have got to be kidding me. This is really a stretch.

    • r

      Knowing NYC bicyclists, they won’t use the new bike lanes anyway. They much prefer to shoot through traffic lanes the wrong way, force motor vehicles to slam on their brakes, ignore traffic signals, and whine about being victims.

  • steve

    Marcia, Thanks for reminding me why I never watch CBS News, or anything else on CBS any more.
    I’m a driver, with a high income, but I won’t be watching any of your news, shows and advertisements, as long as the CBS management encourages genocidal maniacs like Kramer.
    Is there any memory of Edward R Murrow at CBS?

  • Mike

    Is this Fox News? “…leaving many wondering what would happen if a man on a bike were a terrorist.” Well “some people say” that this reporter is extremely clueless.

  • Bill

    The intent of CBS’ anti-bike (read: anti-common sense) objective is fairly obvious.

    A considerably portion of ad revenue comes from auto makers and sellers. Just look at the fact that the word “cars” in paragraph three has a hyperlink to a car advertisement.

  • chuck

    Nothing I love more than whiners – usually not even residents of NYC – who drive their cars in the city and then complain about congestion.

    I actually live in the city. I ride a bike. And I will get there faster… Bike lanes or no bike lanes.

    PS- Marcia Kramer is an effing moron.

  • Todd

    This is moronic. “bikes break the traffic rules constantly”… Cars don’t??? This city is full of people who drive like idiots, run red red lights etc., etc. Why are automobile operators elevated to the status of saintly do gooders any time the bike discussion comes up???

    I don’t ride in NYC cause I don’t want to die on a bike.

    I love how there “journalists” complain about the bike lanes and blame them on officials when the community boards ask for and approve these projects most of the time.

    • http://keithsnyder.wordpress.com/ Keith Snyder

      You think Marcia Kramer is a journalist?

  • Oh No, Terrorists on Bikes!

    “what would happen if a man on a bike were a terrorist.”

    That’s nothing. What if a terrorist were wearing ROLLER SKATES???

    Yeah, I know. It blew my mind too.

  • pd

    Marcia brings up one good point: Who are the roads for? I would bet that close to 100% of the cyclists are residents of NYC. Any guesses on the owners of vehicles… .If the drivers are already willing to drive in and out of the city at rush hour, what’s the big difference in congestion, the amount of time to wait for one more light maybe. As I always say to impatient drivers…if your time is so important, why are you driving yourself?

  • chris

    Do you talk to your mother with that mouth? You should be ashamed of yourself.

  • Brian Van Nieuwenhoven

    This is baseless inciteful hate speech. Bicycles have killed nobody in the past 2 years. Cars in NYC have killed 4 bystanders in the past WEEK. SAFE CARS OR NO CARS.

    Also, you know what’s ruining NYC?: People who complain about things ruining NYC. This is a fine city with good neighbors. Have some pride and tact. I am bewildered and insulted that people among me feel like someone using a bicycle is ruining their lives, enough to post on a message board about it, when they live in the greatest city in the world with the best living standards in the world. What toxic, spoiled bourgeoisie attitudes.

  • jack h

    When i see Blumberberg riding a bike daily in these new lanes i will then buy into them. Until then i await the first casualty as the Bloomberg administration tries to prove….You can fit ten pounds of doo doo in a five pound bag…

  • http://keithsnyder.wordpress.com/ Keith Snyder

    As the bicycle infrastructure grows, the law is going to have to stop treating bicycles as though they’re cars. They have different characteristics and really need to be treated differently, just as pedestrians are. The official state sport of New York notwithstanding (that would be “Complaining”), these are just growing pains.

    • Just sayin

      Agreed. Bike haters like to complain about bicylcists breaking laws but that is only because the law doesn’t make sense as is. Juat as the NYPD (for good reason) does not give tickets to every jaywalker, it can’t give tickets to bicycliists for ever lnfraction, e.g. running a redlight at 5 miles on hour when it is perfectly safe..

      The law shoudl be changed to a reckless standard.and only go after people who are being dangerous on bikes.

  • Steve

    Brilliant, logic! Over 75 people have been killed by cars this year, zero by bikes. But I’ve only lived in New York for 30 of my 45 years, so what do I know?

  • crankmychain!

    Of course, car drivers never break the rules in NYC and it’s not bikes that are causing the congestion – it’s cars that take up 10x the space of their drivers..

    Since when did the car drivers buy the exclusive right to our right of way?

  • Steve

    A terrorist might use it? Have you never heard of car bombs? If that’s the best you can do, Marcia, I hope to see your report calling for all cars to be banned from anywhere near the embassies. You ought to be ashamed of yourself and CBS ought to be embarrassed for having you on the payroll. What a total joke!

  • bobbyshades

    BLOOMBERG HAS RUINED THIS CITY

  • kdt

    Really? You are so desperate that you were forced to play the terrorist card? And on top of the Israel card, no less? Do you think we’re morons?

    • http://keithsnyder.wordpress.com/ Keith Snyder

      Yes she does. See comments for evidence.

    • Stan

      Yes, that comment was an 11 on the stupid scale.

      You know what? There is a sidewalk and a road near the consulate too! What if a terroist decides to walk or drive?

  • VLM

    @Ronny: Yeah! How dare they make streets safer for everyone else and more urban friendly! Move to New Jersey if you want soul-crushing congestion and fumes as your norm. Do you actually live in Manhattan or just pretend to?

  • Ronny

    Thank GOD Bloomberg and this idiot traffic commissoner will be gone soon.

  • Michael

    I think all New Yorkers know that cyclists simply do not follow the rules of the road, putting everyone else in real danger. It’s really, really stupid to install more mike lanes without setting up any process to ensure lawful riding first.

    • Chris

      That logic is backward. I think making cycling safer and more accessible should make cyclist obey laws more, and not the other way around. however a healthy dose of traffic law enforcement against cyclists who ignore laws (especially during rush hour) would help too

    • Brian Van Nieuwenhoven

      I think a lot of New Yorkers make generalizations that are at odds with reality. There are a lot of cyclists who follow the rules of the road strictly (especially because it’s deadly for them not to do so), and there is an active, constant process that ensures lawful riding for those who do not.

      I don’t expect you to stand around all day counting cyclists and pedestrians who do and don’t follow the law. But I also don’t expect you to make absolute, authoritative statements that could only be validated by such careful, dedicated observation. Hey, I’ve seen a couple of dogs bite people… surely that means we all know that dogs tend to bite people. GAS THEM ALL…

    • Stan

      I think all cyclists know that cars simply do not follow the rules of the road. They speed, they drive carelessly, they fail to yield and they run red lights. All cyclists know that harmless rule violations like “jaybiking” help to protect cyclists against outlaw drivers.

  • More Bike Lanes

    MORE BIKE LANES!!
    It makes no sense to have intermittent bike lanes. Why not target aggressive drivers of cars and bikes. As soon as a light is green too often drivers speed ahead not giving anyone room.

  • Frostie

    The same rules of the road that are for cars, should apply to bikes – but bikes
    don’t seem to have any rules – or none that are enforced.
    Bikes come speeding out from all directions, they don’t stop for red lights, they come way out into the middle – they are a menace and hazard.
    Add to that now the skateboarders – its nothing but a big playground – this
    is the worst the city has ever been.

    • Renegade Unicyclist

      Worst the city has ever been? Fewer people die on the city’s streets today than any point in the past 100 years. I’d call that success. What metric are you using?

1 2 3
blog comments powered by Disqus
Listen Live!

Latest News Video