ALBANY, NY (AP / CBSNewYork) – The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is making a top priority of reviewing the Indian Point power plant located north of New York City near a geologic fault line.

WCBS 880’s Catherine Cioffi: Stony Point Supervisor Proposes Alternative To Indian Point

WCBS 880’s Peter Haskell: New York State Officials Seem Satisfied with Nuclear Regularoty Commission Assurances About Indian Point

“My position has been for a long time that the plant is risky,” said Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who sent a team to meet with the NRC Tuesday. As attorney general he had, in 2007, accused the NRC of being irresponsible as it sought to relicense the plant, even as New York City continues to depend on its power.

“My position hasn’t changed,” Cuomo said after debriefing his team.

Cuomo said that as much as 6 percent of the U.S. population lies within a 50-mile radius of the plant and “evacuation isn’t even a feasible concept.”

Opponents of the Westchester plant 35 miles north of New York City have new ammunition following the nuclear crisis in Japan, brought on by an earthquake and tsunami. They also point to recent data from the U.S. Geological Survey about risks posed by a nearby fault line.

NRC spokesman Neil Sheehan said the meeting yielded several agreements. He said state officials will join NRC inspectors as they review the plant’s ability to withstand stronger earthquakes. When the reactors were built in the 1970s, they were intended to withstand the region’s most serious earthquake in history. But new seismic data shows greater resilience may be warranted.

Sheehan also said the NRC will share its data with the Cuomo administration as soon as it’s available, if there is no legal concern that proprietary information would be released. He said the NRC will make Indian Point the top priority in reviewing plant owners’ responses nationwide to the NRC’s questions about earthquake scenarios.

Sheehan said that data is expected next year. The relicensing review continues. One reactor’s license expires in 2013, the other in 2015.

The owner of New York’s Indian Point nuclear power plant says the facility is not susceptible to the kind of earthquake and tsunami that rocked Japan.

Entergy Corp.‘s vice president, John McCann, told Westchester County legislators on Monday that the earthquake in Japan was much more powerful than any recorded in the region of Indian Point.

McCann said he expected changes to be made in response to the events in Japan, but he didn’t say what they would be.

Entergy on Monday took out a full-page ad in The New York Times reassuring the public that the facility is designed to withstand the strongest earthquake anticipated in the area.

“The NRC is the problem, not the solution,” said Richard Brodsky, a former Westchester assemblyman still fighting the plant’s relicensing. He recently lost a federal case over structural supports that he argued failed to meet safety requirements in the event of a fire. He said the NRC should have been enforcing the issue, rather than provide Entergy with an exemption.

On Tuesday, Brodsky announced that he filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain NRC exemptions to all safety and health regulations at all commercial nuclear plants nationwide.

What if Indian Point were closed?

Stony Point Supervisor William Sherwood has a plan to replace the energy that would be lost.

He suggests a gas-fire turbine plant built at the site of the old Mirant power plant.

“I don’t think there’s any question that everyone would be far more comfortable with a gas-fire plant as opposed to a nuclear plant,” Sherwood told WCBS 880 reporter Catherine Cioffi.

Sherwood is already telling elected officials about what he calls his “safe energy plan.”

“We do have zoning in place for it. If everyone got on board, we could do it in five years, maybe six,” said Sherwood.

He says he’ll pitch his idea to anyone who’ll listen.

(TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

Comments (5)
  1. Reality says:

    There is no question that far more people die every year as a result of our dependance on fossil fuels than have ever died in the history of nuclear power (only one fatal accident so far and no plants anywhere near that dangerous exist in western countries).

  2. what a waste says:

    It doensnt matter whether or not it can withstand a Tsunami or a 9.0 earthquake, what does matter is if there is a problem at the plant, there has got to be a way to evacuate the area and right now thats not possible. The Japanese never expected this to happen, why do NYers think we are above mother nature or disasters? We should thinking about our safety and those who live in the surrounding areas to the plants, before its too late.

  3. Jim says:

    We have not built any plants in over 35 years. Who has built them on the cheap? The Japan nuke issue was not of the earthquake, but of the Tsunami 30ft high that came in 3 miles on shore. The plant has withstood a 9.1 earthquake and tsunami for the most part. If you eliminate the tsunami we would not even be discussing nuke plant. This is a political agenda of the Leftwing crazies that have all the investments in so called new energy technologies, wind, solar, and now garbage burning plants. I bet the Nuke plants are safer than those 5000 degree firepits built in the ground. In an emergency situation I bet they both give a comparrible threat to mass public

  4. sainath says:

    we wnt indian specific safegaurd

  5. jerseyjoey says:

    When ever corporate America and Wall street are involved along with the State and Fed Gov you can be asured that its a load of lies and BS, bottom line is Nuke power is the future but only with new plants that are built to last and with new tech. plants over 40 or 50 years old need to be torn down and new plants built in there place. I support Nuke Power but only if corporations who own and run them dont do it on the cheap like they have been.

Leave a Reply to sainath Cancel reply