Former major-leaguer Rico Brogna will be writing for WFAN during the MLB season. This is his debut column.

By Rico Brogna
» More Columns

As a former MLB player, pro scout, field manager and front office personnel executive, I feel like I have a unique perspective on almost everything baseball (or at least I should say that I have an opinion on everything baseball). Honestly, perhaps the most frustrating and annoying thing I hear and listen to is arguments by people, both pro and con, regarding entry into the pro baseball HOF.

First of all, you are either a Hall of Famer or you are not. Period! This leads to my argument regarding the phantom “levels” of the Hall. How in the world are there first ballot HOF players, second and third ballot guys and then finally there’s a group of baseball people that decide on their own if someone should get in if he’s been on the outside looking in forever. What in the world are we talking about people? You are a Hall of Famer or you are not! If nobody is worthy of entry into the Hall that particular year, than no one goes in. Make sense to me. If there are seven eligible and worthy people in a given year, then congratulations, you are being inducted into the Hall.

Barry Bonds in recent years has been a heated debate. Should he or shouldn’t he get in the HOF? And if the answer is yes, should Barry be a first ballot HOF? C’mon man! This guy was unbelievable, PED’s or whatever! There is one thing you need to ask yourself, “Is Barry Bonds and his performance on the field during his career worthy of HOF entry? As my son would say (he’s 8 years old), “Duh!” ‘Nuff said. Barry is simply one of the best to ever play this great game. No maybe, no but what about the help he might have gotten, and no, well, lets put him in but make him wait. I see clearly now, the powers that be are playing HOF God? C’mon man! If Barry is not an automatic, in any era, no matter what help he might have gotten, Hall of Fame baseball player, than I’m done with this Cooperstown thing.

Listen, Mike Piazza, best known probably for his monster seasons in New York as a Metropolitan, is a HOF baseball player. He is either in the hall or not in the Hall. It’s a no-brainer for this MLB alumnus. The political aspects involved with the HOF are exactly what are wrong with its processes. People, powerful baseball people, decide official entry on what criteria? Is it statistics? Is it championships? Is it longevity and strong character and personal make-up? The now famous saying in our technologically consumed world, “At the end of the day, the player is either a HOF player, or he is not!

There are no levels in the Hall, no, no and no. There are no gold-stamped first ballot HOF players either, no, no and no. It’s a simply yes he is, or no he is not! Personally, I dislike individual awards in team sports anyway. Most positive and productive accomplishments by athletes in team sports are either helped or hindered by the teams that he or she played on. Last thing, when people mention that Keith Hernandez is one of the best all-time 1B, ever, doesn’t that mean he is a HOF caliber baseball player? I think so. And the same exact argument can be made for “Donnie Baseball” (Mattingly). Hall of Fame baseball players are easily sighted and easily identified. C’mon man!

Are there levels of Hall of Famers? Leave a comment below.

Comments (6)
  1. Steve B (Glendale, CA) says:

    Rule #5 for HOF election: “Voting: Voting shall be based upon the player’s record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played.”

    Bonds lacks “integrity, sportsmanship [and] character.” Apparently Brogna doesn’t care much for rules either.

  2. jh says:

    Hey Rico,,,wake up!!!
    Bonds cheated the game BIGTIME!!!

  3. Dino75 says:

    I agree that the HOF process is way too arbitrary. While there have been certain thresholds that got you in (3,000 hits & 500 home runs), they are also crumbling in the current era. Does SammySosa belong in the HOF? Not in my opinion. Johnny Damon has a good chance at 3,000 hits, does he belong in the HOF? In my opinion no, but he is loved by the press and they do the voting. No disrespect but Bert Blyleven is not a HOF’er. Just my two cents.

  4. bronxilla says:

    I think he has a point. If you need to debate the qualifications for HOF status, then maybe you shouldn’t be in. These debates have slowly watered down the requirements – well this guy is in, and look at his stats compared to my candidate. The HOF should be for immortals, with lifetime numbers and achievements that dazzle the mind, that make entry in the Hall clear and unequivocable.

  5. Lawn-Guy Land says:

    Want to be named to the Hall of Fame? Just write it into your contract. That’s how MVPs and All-Stars are “selected,” so why not Hall Of Famers as well?

  6. toddfromphilly says:

    This is what we have to look for from Rico? Cmon man. At least it can’t get any worse.

Leave a Reply to jh Cancel reply